Mapping the Challenges of HCI: An Application and Evaluation of ChatGPT for Mining Insights at Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for analytical tasks, yet their effectiveness in real-world applications remains underexamined, partly due to the opacity of proprietary models. We evaluate ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) on the practical task of extracting research challenges from a large scholarly corpus in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Using a two-step approach, we first apply GPT-3.5 to extract candidate challenges from the 879 papers in the 2023 ACM CHI Conference proceedings, then use GPT-4 to select the most relevant challenges per paper. This process yielded 4,392 research challenges across 113 topics, which we organized through topic modeling and present in an interactive visualization. We compare the identified challenges with previously established HCI grand challenges and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, finding both strong alignment in areas such as ethics and accessibility, and gaps in areas such as human-AI collaboration. A task-specific evaluation with human raters confirmed near-perfect agreement that the extracted statements represent plausible research challenges (kappa = 0.97). The two-step approach proved cost-effective at approximately US50 for the full corpus, suggesting that LLMs offer a practical means for qualitative text analysis at scale, particularly for prototyping research ideas and examining corpora from multiple analytical perspectives.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 130 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2023.
Builds on
49 of 130 references.
References · 49
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
37 more
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 311
- 2023ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilitiescited by 299
- 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 260
- 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 260
- 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 249
- 2022Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Implicitly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta-Optimizerscited by 204
- 2021Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challengescited by 202
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 155
- 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 148
- 2022Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inferencecited by 145
- 2022Faithful Reasoning Using Large Language Modelscited by 130
- 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulnesscited by 130
- 2023Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2022The Ghost in the Machine has an American accent: value conflict in GPT-3cited by 105
- 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 102
- 2020Fill in the BLANC: Human-free quality estimation of document summariescited by 82
- 2023Supporting Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Combining Codebook with GPT-3 for Deductive Codingcited by 82
- 2022The Creativity of Text-to-Image Generationcited by 73
- 2022Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluationcited by 67
- 2022A Taxonomy of Prompt Modifiers for Text-To-Image Generationcited by 55
- 2023Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMscited by 46
- 2020The Problem with Metrics is a Fundamental Problem for AIcited by 37
- 2023A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspectivecited by 33
- 2019Value-laden Disciplinary Shifts in Machine Learningcited by 25
- 2023ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspectivecited by 22
- 2022The Birth of Bias: A case study on the evolution of gender bias in an English language modelcited by 16
- 2023ConceptEVA: Concept-Based Interactive Exploration and Customization of Document Summariescited by 7
- 2023DeepLens: Interactive Out-of-distribution Data Detection in NLP Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.