mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Offline Reinforcement Learning with Action Preference Query

arXiv 2306.03362 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Training practical agents usually involve offline and online reinforcement learning (RL) to balance the policy's performance and interaction costs. In particular, online fine-tuning has become a commonly used method to correct the erroneous estimates of out-of-distribution data learned in the offline training phase. However, even limited online interactions can be inaccessible or catastrophic for high-stake scenarios like healthcare and autonomous driving. In this work, we introduce an interaction-free training scheme dubbed Offline-with-Action-Preferences (OAP). The main insight is that, compared to online fine-tuning, querying the preferences between pre-collected and learned actions can be equally or even more helpful to the erroneous estimate problem. By adaptively encouraging or suppressing policy constraint according to action preferences, OAP could distinguish overestimation from beneficial policy improvement and thus attains a more accurate evaluation of unseen data. Theoretically, we prove a lower bound of the behavior policy's performance improvement brought by OAP. Moreover, comprehensive experiments on the D4RL benchmark and state-of-the-art algorithms demonstrate that OAP yields higher (29% on average) scores, especially on challenging AntMaze tasks (98% higher).

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.

Builds on

30 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Boosting Offline Reinforcement Learning via Data Rebalancing17 Oct
  2. 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problems2 Mar
  3. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning12 Oct
  4. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning12 Jun
  5. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization14 Mar
  6. 2020EMaQ: Expected-Max Q-Learning Operator for Simple Yet Effective Offline and Online RL21 Jul
  7. 2020Critic Regularized Regression26 Jun
  8. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning8 Jun
  9. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems4 May
  10. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning15 Apr
  11. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning26 Nov

Other references · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  5. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
  6. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  7. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  8. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  9. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  10. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  11. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
  12. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
7 more
  1. 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
  2. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
  3. 2020DisCor: Corrective Feedback in Reinforcement Learning via Distribution Correctioncited by 71
  4. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Education: Opportunities and Challengescited by 25
  5. 2021TOHAN: A One-step Approach towards Few-shot Hypothesis Adaptationcited by 17
  6. 2022Value-Consistent Representation Learning for Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  7. 2020Dynamic Knowledge Distillation for Black-box Hypothesis Transfer Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Active Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Preference Elicitation for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2023Guiding Online Reinforcement Learning with Action-Free Offline Pretraining
  4. 2023Planning to Go Out-of-Distribution in Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2023Finetuning from Offline Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Trade-offs and Practical Solutions
  6. 2021Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluation
  7. 2023Offline Retraining for Online RL: Decoupled Policy Learning to Mitigate Exploration Bias
  8. 2024SAMG: Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via State-Action-Conditional Offline Model Guidance