Bayesian Learning of Optimal Policies in Markov Decision Processes with Countably Infinite State-Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Models of many real-life applications, such as queuing models of communication networks or computing systems, have a countably infinite state-space. Algorithmic and learning procedures that have been developed to produce optimal policies mainly focus on finite state settings, and do not directly apply to these models. To overcome this lacuna, in this work we study the problem of optimal control of a family of discrete-time countable state-space Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) governed by an unknown parameter θ∈Theta, and defined on a countably-infinite state space mathcal X=mathbbZ_+d, with finite action space mathcal A, and an unbounded cost function. We take a Bayesian perspective with the random unknown parameter boldsymbolθ^* generated via a given fixed prior distribution on Theta. To optimally control the unknown MDP, we propose an algorithm based on Thompson sampling with dynamically-sized episodes: at the beginning of each episode, the posterior distribution formed via Bayes' rule is used to produce a parameter estimate, which then decides the policy applied during the episode. To ensure the stability of the Markov chain obtained by following the policy chosen for each parameter, we impose ergodicity assumptions. From this condition and using the solution of the average cost Bellman equation, we establish an tilde O(dhd√|mathcal A|T) upper bound on the Bayesian regret of our algorithm, where T is the time-horizon. Finally, to elucidate the applicability of our algorithm, we consider two different queuing models with unknown dynamics, and show that our algorithm can be applied to develop approximately optimal control algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.
Builds on
17 of 56 references.
References · 17
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
- 2017Learning Unknown Markov Decision Processes: A Thompson Sampling Approachcited by 65
- 2020Queueing Network Controls via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2019Learning in structured MDPs with convex cost functions: Improved regret bounds for inventory managementcited by 22
- 2016Learning Unknown Service Rates in Queues: A Multi-Armed Bandit Approachcited by 18
- 2021Online Learning for Unknown Partially Observable MDPscited by 17
- 2014Bayesian Optimal Control of Smoothly Parameterized Systems: The Lazy Posterior Sampling Algorithmcited by 11
- 2021Job Dispatching Policies for Queueing Systems with Unknown Service Ratescited by 11
- 2018On Learning the cμ Rule in Single and Parallel Server Networkscited by 10
- 2018Augmenting Max-Weight with Explicit Learning for Wireless Scheduling with Switching Costscited by 9
- 2022On learning Whittle index policy for restless bandits with scalable regretcited by 9
5 more
- 2021Learning and Information in Stochastic Networks and Queuescited by 8
- 2022Learning While Scheduling in Multi-Server Systems with Unknown Statistics: MaxWeight with Discounted UCBcited by 8
- 2017Posterior Sampling for Large Scale Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2022Learning-based Optimal Admission Control in a Single Server Queuing Systemcited by 3
- 2022Learning to Admit Optimally in an M/M/k/k+N Queueing System with Unknown Service Ratecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.