mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On learning Whittle index policy for restless bandits with scalable regret

arXiv 2202.03463 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning is an attractive approach to learn good resource allocation and scheduling policies based on data when the system model is unknown. However, the cumulative regret of most RL algorithms scales as tilde O(mathsfS √mathsfA T), where mathsfS is the size of the state space, mathsfA is the size of the action space, T is the horizon, and the tildeO(·) notation hides logarithmic terms. Due to the linear dependence on the size of the state space, these regret bounds are prohibitively large for resource allocation and scheduling problems. In this paper, we present a model-based RL algorithm for such problems which has scalable regret. In particular, we consider a restless bandit model, and propose a Thompson-sampling based learning algorithm which is tuned to the underlying structure of the model. We present two characterizations of the regret of the proposed algorithm with respect to the Whittle index policy. First, we show that for a restless bandit with n arms and at most m activations at each time, the regret scales either as tildeO(mn√T) or tildeO(n2 √T) depending on the reward model. Second, under an additional technical assumption, we show that the regret scales as tildeO(n1.5 √T) or tildeO(maxm√n, n √T). We present numerical examples to illustrate the salient features of the algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2022.

Builds on

16 of 74 references.

References · 16

  1. 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
  2. 2017Learning Unknown Markov Decision Processes: A Thompson Sampling Approachcited by 65
  3. 2018Efficient Bias-Span-Constrained Exploration-Exploitation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  4. 2019Regret Minimization for Reinforcement Learning by Evaluating the Optimal Bias Functioncited by 43
  5. 2020Whittle index based Q-learning for restless bandits with average rewardcited by 43
  6. 2019Regret Bounds for Thompson Sampling in Episodic Restless Bandit Problemscited by 34
  7. 2017Posterior sampling for reinforcement learning: worst-case regret boundscited by 28
  8. 2019Learning in Restless Multi-Armed Bandits via Adaptive Arm Sequencing Rulescited by 15
  9. 2019Thompson Sampling in Non-Episodic Restless Banditscited by 15
  10. 2017Opportunistic Scheduling as Restless Banditscited by 14
  11. 2021Scalable Operator Allocation for Multi-Robot Assistance: A Restless Bandit Approachcited by 9
  12. 2021User Association in Dense mmWave Networks as Restless Banditscited by 5
4 more
  1. 2021Learning Augmented Index Policy for Optimal Service Placement at the Network Edgecited by 4
  2. 2021Two families of indexable partially observable restless bandits and Whittle index computationcited by 2
  3. 2014A near-optimal maintenance policy for automated DR devicescited by 1
  4. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Markovian Bandits: Is Posterior Sampling more Scalable than Optimism?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 1.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Feel-Good Thompson Sampling for Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Model-based RL as a Minimalist Approach to Horizon-Free and Second-Order Bounds
  3. 2024Thompson Sampling for Stochastic Bandits with Noisy Contexts: An Information-Theoretic Regret Analysis
  4. 2026Dynamic Regret for Non-Stationary Linear Bandits via Misspecification Reductions
  5. 2025Logarithmic Regret for Online KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2021Fast Rates for the Regret of Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2023Oracle-Efficient Pessimism: Offline Policy Optimization in Contextual Bandits
  8. 2019Dueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning