Bayesian learning for the stochastic shortest path problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sequential decision-making problems are often modelled as a Markov decision process (MDP). We focus on the stochastic shortest path (SSP) problem, which is an infinite-horizon undiscounted MDP with absorbing terminal states. We develop a Bayesian framework to learn the optimal decision strategy through interactions with the decision-making task. Specifically, we learn the optimal action-value function Q^*, but unlike many existing Bayesian approaches, we do not rely on unrealistic modelling assumptions and ad-hoc approximations. Our approach is to directly construct the posterior beliefs for Q^* through Bellman's optimality equations. For deterministic rewards, we characterise the posterior as a distribution with a manifold density. To facilitate simpler inference, we relax the likelihood so that a Lebesgue density exists. The flip side is to create unidentifiability issues. Specifically, the relaxed posterior can have significant mass on improper decision rules, while the exact posterior will not. We also calculate the exact posterior probabilities for optimal action selections for the tabular parametrisation of Q^*, a Gaussian likelihood relaxation and a Gaussian prior, which is useful in benchmarking studies. Numerical studies on variants of the Deep Sea benchmark verify our findings. We demonstrate that our framework faithfully quantifies uncertainty and, compared to other temporal-difference-based Bayesian methodologies, is more data efficient. We conclude with recommendations for future work.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 58 references.
References · 24
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 236
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2018Randomized Prior Functions for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 218
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2017Deep Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 155
- 2019Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
- 2018Efficient Exploration through Bayesian Deep Q-Networkscited by 67
12 more
- 2017Learning Unknown Markov Decision Processes: A Thompson Sampling Approachcited by 65
- 2019Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 57
- 2018An Information-Theoretic Analysis for Thompson Sampling with Many Actionscited by 35
- 2022A Provably Efficient Model-Free Posterior Sampling Method for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
- 2023Provable and Practical: Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learning via Langevin Monte Carlocited by 29
- 2021Bayesian Bellman Operatorscited by 16
- 2023TD Convergence: An Optimization Perspectivecited by 15
- 2014Kalman Temporal Differencescited by 10
- 2017The Stochastic Shortest Path Problem : A polyhedral combinatorics perspectivecited by 7
- 2019Manifold Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian inference in diffusion modelscited by 6
- 2020Trace-class Gaussian priors for Bayesian learning of neural networks with MCMCcited by 5
- 2023Bayesian Learning of Optimal Policies in Markov Decision Processes with Countably Infinite State-Spacecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.