mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FlairNLP at SemEval-2023 Task 6b: Extraction of Legal Named Entities from Legal Texts using Contextual String Embeddings

arXiv 2306.02182 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Indian court legal texts and processes are essential towards the integrity of the judicial system and towards maintaining the social and political order of the nation. Due to the increase in number of pending court cases, there is an urgent need to develop tools to automate many of the legal processes with the knowledge of artificial intelligence. In this paper, we employ knowledge extraction techniques, specially the named entity extraction of legal entities within court case judgements. We evaluate several state of the art architectures in the realm of sequence labeling using models trained on a curated dataset of legal texts. We observe that a Bi-LSTM model trained on Flair Embeddings achieves the best results, and we also publish the BIO formatted dataset as part of this paper.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2023.

Builds on

7 of 16 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111
  3. 2021ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanationcited by 78
  4. 2021Exploring Transformers in Natural Language Generation: GPT, BERT, and XLNetcited by 27
  5. 2022Named Entity Recognition in Indian court judgmentscited by 26
  6. 2022Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documentscited by 25
  7. 2021LeSICiN: A Heterogeneous Graph-based Approach for Automatic Legal Statute Identification from Indian Legal Documentscited by 23

Built on by

Not cited yet.