mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving the Robustness of Summarization Systems with Dual Augmentation

arXiv 2306.01090 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A robust summarization system should be able to capture the gist of the document, regardless of the specific word choices or noise in the input. In this work, we first explore the summarization models' robustness against perturbations including word-level synonym substitution and noise. To create semantic-consistent substitutes, we propose a SummAttacker, which is an efficient approach to generating adversarial samples based on language models. Experimental results show that state-of-the-art summarization models have a significant decrease in performance on adversarial and noisy test sets. Next, we analyze the vulnerability of the summarization systems and explore improving the robustness by data augmentation. Specifically, the first brittleness factor we found is the poor understanding of infrequent words in the input. Correspondingly, we feed the encoder with more diverse cases created by SummAttacker in the input space. The other factor is in the latent space, where the attacked inputs bring more variations to the hidden states. Hence, we construct adversarial decoder input and devise manifold softmixing operation in hidden space to introduce more diversity. Experimental results on Gigaword and CNN/DM datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves significant improvements over strong baselines and exhibits higher robustness on noisy, attacked, and clean datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  8. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
  9. 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 489
  10. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
  11. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  12. 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 222
11 more
  1. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 216
  2. 2019Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluationcited by 189
  3. 2020Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapsecited by 157
  4. 2019BIGPATENT: A Large-Scale Dataset for Abstractive and Coherent Summarizationcited by 156
  5. 2019Robust Neural Machine Translation with Doubly Adversarial Inputscited by 106
  6. 2020AdvAug: Robust Adversarial Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 67
  7. 2018Towards Robust Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  8. 2020Noisy Self-Knowledge Distillation for Text Summarizationcited by 31
  9. 2019Earlier Isn't Always Better: Sub-aspect Analysis on Corpus and System Biases in Summarizationcited by 28
  10. 2022Towards Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 27
  11. 2023Learning towards Selective Data Augmentation for Dialogue Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 1.

9 papers.