mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Diversity Augmentation of Dynamic User Preference Data for Boosting Personalized Text Summarizers

arXiv 2510.10082 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Document summarization enables efficient extraction of user-relevant content but is inherently shaped by individual subjectivity, making it challenging to identify subjective salient information in multifaceted documents. This complexity underscores the necessity for personalized summarization. However, training models for personalized summarization has so far been challenging, particularly because diverse training data containing both user preference history (i.e., click-skip trajectory) and expected (gold-reference) summaries are scarce. The MS/CAS PENS dataset is a valuable resource but includes only preference history without target summaries, preventing end-to-end supervised learning, and its limited topic-transition diversity further restricts generalization. To address this, we propose PerAugy, a novel cross-trajectory shuffling and summary-content perturbation based data augmentation technique that significantly boosts the accuracy of four state-of-the-art baseline (SOTA) user-encoders commonly used in personalized summarization frameworks (best result: 0.132uparrow w.r.t AUC). We select two such SOTA summarizer frameworks as baselines and observe that when augmented with their corresponding improved user-encoders, they consistently show an increase in personalization (avg. boost: 61.2%uparrow w.r.t. PSE-SU4 metric). As a post-hoc analysis of the role of induced diversity in the augmented dataset by peraugy, we introduce three dataset diversity metrics -- TP, RTC, and degreed to quantify the induced diversity. We find that TP and DegreeD strongly correlate with user-encoder performance on the PerAugy-generated dataset across all accuracy metrics, indicating that increased dataset diversity is a key factor driving performance gains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2025.

Builds on

31 of 51 references.

References · 31

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  5. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  6. 2019Multi-News: a Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset and Abstractive Hierarchical Modelcited by 431
  7. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 431
  8. 2020GSum: A General Framework for Guided Neural Abstractive Summarizationcited by 129
  9. 2020CTRLsum: Towards Generic Controllable Text Summarizationcited by 98
  10. 2023Boosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge Promptingcited by 77
  11. 2019Neural News Recommendation with Attentive Multi-View Learningcited by 59
  12. 2020Improving Zero and Few-Shot Abstractive Summarization with Intermediate Fine-tuning and Data Augmentationcited by 53
19 more
  1. 2019Learning Data Manipulation for Augmentation and Weightingcited by 45
  2. 2021Augmenting Sequential Recommendation with Pseudo-Prior Items via Reversely Pre-training Transformercited by 45
  3. 2024Dataset Regeneration for Sequential Recommendationcited by 19
  4. 2023Improving Recommendation Fairness via Data Augmentationcited by 18
  5. 2024Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarizationcited by 17
  6. 2023A Self-Correcting Sequential Recommendercited by 9
  7. 2023Improving the Robustness of Summarization Systems with Dual Augmentationcited by 9
  8. 2024Structured Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Few-Shot Generation of Content-Grounded QA Conversationscited by 9
  9. 2024Tell me what I need to know: Exploring LLM-based (Personalized) Abstractive Multi-Source Meeting Summarizationcited by 9
  10. 2020What Makes a Good and Useful Summary? Incorporating Users in Automatic Summarization Researchcited by 8
  11. 2023Masked and Swapped Sequence Modeling for Next Novel Basket Recommendation in Grocery Shoppingcited by 7
  12. 2024A Guide To Effectively Leveraging LLMs for Low-Resource Text Summarization: Data Augmentation and Semi-supervised Approachescited by 7
  13. 2024Segment, Shuffle, and Stitch: A Simple Layer for Improving Time-Series Representationscited by 6
  14. 2023Personalized Abstractive Summarization by Tri-agent Generation Pipelinecited by 4
  15. 2025Panoramic Interests: Stylistic-Content Aware Personalized Headline Generationcited by 4
  16. 2024PerSEval: Assessing Personalization in Text Summarizerscited by 3
  17. 2022Learning to Augment for Casual User Recommendationcited by 2
  18. 2025Fact-Preserved Personalized News Headline Generationcited by 2
  19. 2023Learning from All Sides: Diversified Positive Augmentation via Self-distillation in Recommendationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.