mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NeuroGF: A Neural Representation for Fast Geodesic Distance and Path Queries

arXiv 2306.00658 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Geodesics are essential in many geometry processing applications. However, traditional algorithms for computing geodesic distances and paths on 3D mesh models are often inefficient and slow. This makes them impractical for scenarios that require extensive querying of arbitrary point-to-point geodesics. Although neural implicit representations have emerged as a popular way of representing 3D shape geometries, there is still no research on representing geodesics with deep implicit functions. To bridge this gap, this paper presents the first attempt to represent geodesics on 3D mesh models using neural implicit functions. Specifically, we introduce neural geodesic fields (NeuroGFs), which are learned to represent the all-pairs geodesics of a given mesh. By using NeuroGFs, we can efficiently and accurately answer queries of arbitrary point-to-point geodesic distances and paths, overcoming the limitations of traditional algorithms. Evaluations on common 3D models show that NeuroGFs exhibit exceptional performance in solving the single-source all-destination (SSAD) and point-to-point geodesics, and achieve high accuracy consistently. Besides, NeuroGFs also offer the unique advantage of encoding both 3D geometry and geodesics in a unified representation. Moreover, we further extend generalizable learning frameworks of NeuroGFs by adding shape feature encoders, which also show satisfactory performances for unseen shapes and categories. Code is made available at https://github.com/keeganhk/NeuroGF/tree/master.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  2. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  3. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  4. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
  5. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  6. 2020Convolutional Occupancy Networkscited by 760
  7. 2018AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generationcited by 539
  8. 2021Neural Geometric Level of Detail: Real-time Rendering with Implicit 3D Shapescited by 426
  9. 2020Local Implicit Grid Representations for 3D Scenescited by 372
  10. 2019DISN: Deep Implicit Surface Network for High-quality Single-view 3D Reconstructioncited by 332
  11. 2020Deep Local Shapes: Learning Local SDF Priors for Detailed 3D Reconstructioncited by 321
  12. 2021Geometry-Consistent Neural Shape Representation with Implicit Displacement Fieldscited by 60
8 more
  1. 2021Neural Surface Mapscited by 34
  2. 2022NeuForm: Adaptive Overfitting for Neural Shape Editingcited by 18
  3. 2019GeoNet: Deep Geodesic Networks for Point Cloud Analysiscited by 11
  4. 2022Neural Convolutional Surfacescited by 9
  5. 2022GraphWalks: Efficient Shape Agnostic Geodesic Shortest Path Estimationcited by 8
  6. 2013Parallel Chen-Han (PCH) Algorithm for Discrete Geodesicscited by 5
  7. 2018Parallel and Scalable Heat Methods for Geodesic Distance Computationcited by 4
  8. 2022Geodesic-Former: a Geodesic-Guided Few-shot 3D Point Cloud Instance Segmentercited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.