mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning for Edge-Weighted Online Bipartite Matching with Robustness Guarantees

arXiv 2306.00172 ↗First posted 31 May 2023cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many problems, such as online ad display, can be formulated as online bipartite matching. The crucial challenge lies in the nature of sequentially-revealed online item information, based on which we make irreversible matching decisions at each step. While numerous expert online algorithms have been proposed with bounded worst-case competitive ratios, they may not offer satisfactory performance in average cases. On the other hand, reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied to improve the average performance, but it lacks robustness and can perform arbitrarily poorly. In this paper, we propose a novel RL-based approach to edge-weighted online bipartite matching with robustness guarantees (LOMAR), achieving both good average-case and worst-case performance. The key novelty of LOMAR is a new online switching operation which, based on a judicious condition to hedge against future uncertainties, decides whether to follow the expert's decision or the RL decision for each online item. We prove that for any ρ∈[0,1], LOMAR is ρ-competitive against any given expert online algorithm. To improve the average performance, we train the RL policy by explicitly considering the online switching operation. Finally, we run empirical experiments to demonstrate the advantages of LOMAR compared to existing baselines. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Ren-Research/LOMAR

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.

Builds on

31 of 53 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  2. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  3. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  4. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 366
  5. 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 339
  6. 2018Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 227
  7. 2020Projection-Based Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 203
  8. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 195
  9. 2020Online metric algorithms with untrusted predictionscited by 75
  10. 2020Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advicecited by 71
  11. 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
  12. 2020Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithmscited by 64
19 more
  1. 2016Conservative Banditscited by 59
  2. 2016Conservative Contextual Linear Banditscited by 57
  3. 2021Risk Bounds and Calibration for a Smart Predict-then-Optimize Methodcited by 29
  4. 2020Conservative Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  5. 2022Online Bipartite Matching with Advice: Tight Robustness-Consistency Tradeoffs for the Two-Stage Modelcited by 19
  6. 2022Chasing Convex Bodies and Functions with Black-Box Advicecited by 19
  7. 2020Neural Bipartite Matchingcited by 17
  8. 2020Data-driven Competitive Algorithms for Online Knapsack and Set Covercited by 14
  9. 2021Robust Learning-Augmented Caching: An Experimental Studycited by 12
  10. 2022A Regression Approach to Learning-Augmented Online Algorithmscited by 12
  11. 2021Deep Policies for Online Bipartite Matching: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 10
  12. 2022Smoothed Online Optimization with Unreliable Predictionscited by 10
  13. 2021A Reduction-Based Framework for Conservative Bandits and Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  14. 2020Edge-Weighted Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 8
  15. 2018Balancing Relevance and Diversity in Online Bipartite Matching via Submodularitycited by 7
  16. 2021Adversarial Deep Learning for Online Resource Allocationcited by 7
  17. 2020Learning Robust Algorithms for Online Allocation Problems Using Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
  18. 2020Data-driven Algorithm Designcited by 5
  19. 2021Online Stochastic Matching, Poisson Arrivals, and the Natural Linear Programcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.