mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Potentials for Dynamic Matching and Application to Heart Transplantation

arXiv 2602.08878 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Each year, thousands of patients in need of heart transplants face life-threatening wait times due to organ scarcity. While allocation policies aim to maximize population-level outcomes, current approaches often fail to account for the dynamic arrival of organs and the composition of waitlisted candidates, thereby hampering efficiency. The United States is transitioning from rigid, rule-based allocation to more flexible data-driven models. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for non-myopic policy optimization in general online matching relying on potentials, a concept originally introduced for kidney exchange. We develop scalable and accurate ways of learning potentials that are higher-dimensional and more expressive than prior approaches. Our approach is a form of self-supervised imitation learning: the potentials are trained to mimic an omniscient algorithm that has perfect foresight. We focus on the application of heart transplant allocation and demonstrate, using real historical data, that our policies significantly outperform prior approaches -- including the current US status quo policy and the proposed continuous distribution framework -- in optimizing for population-level outcomes. Our analysis and methods come at a pivotal moment in US policy, as the current heart transplant allocation system is under review. We propose a scalable and theoretically grounded path toward more effective organ allocation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

14 of 60 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  2. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 308
  3. 2020Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advicecited by 71
  4. 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 51
  5. 2020Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyondcited by 22
  6. 2021Deep Policies for Online Bipartite Matching: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 10
  7. 2016Position-Indexed Formulations for Kidney Exchangecited by 6
  8. 2023Learning for Edge-Weighted Online Bipartite Matching with Robustness Guaranteescited by 5
  9. 2025Policy Optimization for Dynamic Heart Transplant Allocationcited by 5
  10. 2021Incentive-Compatible Kidney Exchange in a Slightly Semi-Random Modelcited by 4
  11. 2026Near-Optimal Dynamic Matching via Coarsening with Application to Heart Transplantationcited by 3
  12. 2026Position: Machine Learning for Heart Transplant Allocation Policy Optimization Should Account for Incentivescited by 3
2 more
  1. 2024Online Matching: A Brief Surveycited by 2
  2. 2025Learning-Based Planning for Improving Science Return of Earth Observation Satellitescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Guardian-regularized Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning for Smart Weaning of Mechanical Circulatory Devices
  2. 2026Beyond Patient Invariance: Learning Cardiac Dynamics via Action-Conditioned JEPAs
  3. 2026Traj-Evolve: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent System for Patient Trajectory Modeling in Lung Cancer Early Detection
  4. 2026Imitation Learning for Combinatorial Optimisation under Uncertainty
  5. 2025Who Gets the Kidney? Human-AI Alignment, Indecision, and Moral Values
  6. 2025AKIBoards: A Structure-Following Multiagent System for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
  7. 2024Pruning the Path to Optimal Care: Identifying Systematically Suboptimal Medical Decision-Making with Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2020Strictly Batch Imitation Learning by Energy-based Distribution Matching