Balancing Relevance and Diversity in Online Bipartite Matching via Submodularity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In bipartite matching problems, vertices on one side of a bipartite graph are paired with those on the other. In its online variant, one side of the graph is available offline, while the vertices on the other side arrive online. When a vertex arrives, an irrevocable and immediate decision should be made by the algorithm; either match it to an available vertex or drop it. Examples of such problems include matching workers to firms, advertisers to keywords, organs to patients, and so on. Much of the literature focuses on maximizing the total relevance---modeled via total weight---of the matching. However, in many real-world problems, it is also important to consider contributions of diversity: hiring a diverse pool of candidates, displaying a relevant but diverse set of ads, and so on. In this paper, we propose the Online Submodular Bipartite Matching (osbm) problem, where the goal is to maximize a submodular function f over the set of matched edges. This objective is general enough to capture the notion of both diversity (e.g., a weighted coverage function) and relevance (e.g., the traditional linear function)---as well as many other natural objective functions occurring in practice (e.g., limited total budget in advertising settings). We propose novel algorithms that have provable guarantees and are essentially optimal when restricted to various special cases. We also run experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets to validate our algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3.
7 papers.
- 2021Deep Policies for Online Bipartite Matching: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 10
- 2022Rawlsian Fairness in Online Bipartite Matching: Two-sided, Group, and Individualcited by 7
- 2021Fairness Maximization among Offline Agents in Online-Matching Marketscited by 6
- 2023Learning for Edge-Weighted Online Bipartite Matching with Robustness Guaranteescited by 5
- 2021Subgroup Fairness in Two-Sided Marketscited by 3
- 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocationcited by 2
- 2023Ranking with Slot Constraintscited by 0
- 2023Ranking with Slot Constraints27 Oct 2023
- 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocation23 Jun 2023
- 2023Learning for Edge-Weighted Online Bipartite Matching with Robustness Guarantees31 May 2023
- 2022Rawlsian Fairness in Online Bipartite Matching: Two-sided, Group, and Individual16 Jan 2022
- 2021Deep Policies for Online Bipartite Matching: A Reinforcement Learning Approach21 Sep 2021
- 2021Fairness Maximization among Offline Agents in Online-Matching Markets18 Sep 2021
- 2021Subgroup Fairness in Two-Sided Markets4 Jun 2021