mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Federated Learning for Semantic Parsing: Task Formulation, Evaluation Setup, New Algorithms

arXiv 2305.17221 ↗First posted 26 May 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.DBcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies a new task of federated learning (FL) for semantic parsing, where multiple clients collaboratively train one global model without sharing their semantic parsing data. By leveraging data from multiple clients, the FL paradigm can be especially beneficial for clients that have little training data to develop a data-hungry neural semantic parser on their own. We propose an evaluation setup to study this task, where we re-purpose widely-used single-domain text-to-SQL datasets as clients to form a realistic heterogeneous FL setting and collaboratively train a global model. As standard FL algorithms suffer from the high client heterogeneity in our realistic setup, we further propose a novel LOss Reduction Adjusted Re-weighting (Lorar) mechanism to mitigate the performance degradation, which adjusts each client's contribution to the global model update based on its training loss reduction during each round. Our intuition is that the larger the loss reduction, the further away the current global model is from the client's local optimum, and the larger weight the client should get. By applying Lorar to three widely adopted FL algorithms (FedAvg, FedOPT and FedProx), we observe that their performance can be improved substantially on average (4%-20% absolute gain under MacroAvg) and that clients with smaller datasets enjoy larger performance gains. In addition, the global model converges faster for almost all the clients.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  5. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  6. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  7. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
  8. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  9. 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 612
  10. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
  11. 2021FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalizationcited by 565
  12. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
11 more
  1. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 402
  2. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
  3. 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 298
  4. 2022UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Modelscited by 231
  5. 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 202
  6. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  7. 2019Overcoming Forgetting in Federated Learning on Non-IID Datacited by 120
  8. 2022Evaluating the Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 101
  9. 2017Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedbackcited by 98
  10. 2020SmBoP: Semi-autoregressive Bottom-up Semantic Parsingcited by 97
  11. 2021FedNLP: Benchmarking Federated Learning Methods for Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 84

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.