mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EvoSchema: Towards Text-to-SQL Robustness Against Schema Evolution

arXiv 2603.10697 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2026cs.DB cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural text-to-SQL models, which translate natural language questions (NLQs) into SQL queries given a database schema, have achieved remarkable performance. However, database schemas frequently evolve to meet new requirements. Such schema evolution often leads to performance degradation for models trained on static schemas. Existing work either mainly focuses on simply paraphrasing some syntactic or semantic mappings among NLQ, DB and SQL, or lacks a comprehensive and controllable way to investigate the model robustness issue under the schema evolution, which is insufficient when facing the increasingly complex and rich database schema changes in reality, especially in the LLM era. To address the challenges posed by schema evolution, we present EvoSchema, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess and enhance the robustness of text-to-SQL systems under real-world schema changes. EvoSchema introduces a novel schema evolution taxonomy, encompassing ten perturbation types across columnlevel and table-level modifications, systematically simulating the dynamic nature of database schemas. Through EvoSchema, we conduct an in-depth evaluation spanning different open source and closed-source LLMs, revealing that table-level perturbations have a significantly greater impact on model performance compared to column-level changes. Furthermore, EvoSchema inspires the development of more resilient text-to-SQL systems, in terms of both model training and database design. The models trained on EvoSchema's diverse schema designs can force the model to distinguish the schema difference for the same questions to avoid learning spurious patterns, which demonstrate remarkable robustness compared to those trained on unperturbed data on average. This benchmark offers valuable insights into model behavior and a path forward for designing systems capable of thriving in dynamic, real-world environments.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  4. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  5. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
  6. 2023PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallelcited by 641
  7. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
  8. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 378
  9. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 183
  10. 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
  11. 2023Exploring Chain-of-Thought Style Prompting for Text-to-SQLcited by 69
  12. 2023ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 65
9 more
  1. 2018Robust Text-to-SQL Generation with Execution-Guided Decodingcited by 51
  2. 2023Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustnesscited by 50
  3. 2024FinSQL: Model-Agnostic LLMs-based Text-to-SQL Framework for Financial Analysiscited by 35
  4. 2024SQLBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation for Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 32
  5. 2022Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models Against Natural and Realistic Adversarial Table Perturbationcited by 28
  6. 2023Enhancing Text-to-SQL Translation for Financial System Designcited by 12
  7. 2024Evaluating the Data Model Robustness of Text-to-SQL Systems Based on Real User Queriescited by 12
  8. 2022Towards Generalizable and Robust Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 7
  9. 2023Federated Learning for Semantic Parsing: Task Formulation, Evaluation Setup, New Algorithmscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.