Inferring the Future by Imagining the Past
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A single panel of a comic book can say a lot: it can depict not only where the characters currently are, but also their motions, their motivations, their emotions, and what they might do next. More generally, humans routinely infer complex sequences of past and future events from a *static snapshot* of a *dynamic scene*, even in situations they have never seen before. In this paper, we model how humans make such rapid and flexible inferences. Building on a long line of work in cognitive science, we offer a Monte Carlo algorithm whose inferences correlate well with human intuitions in a wide variety of domains, while only using a small, cognitively-plausible number of samples. Our key technical insight is a surprising connection between our inference problem and Monte Carlo path tracing, which allows us to apply decades of ideas from the computer graphics community to this seemingly-unrelated theory of mind task.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.
Builds on
9 of 65 references.
References · 9
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 298
- 2020Online Bayesian Goal Inference for Boundedly-Rational Planning Agentscited by 68
- 2019Preferences Implicit in the State of the Worldcited by 34
- 2021PHASE: PHysically-grounded Abstract Social Events for Machine Social Perceptioncited by 22
- 2022Designing Perceptual Puzzles by Differentiating Probabilistic Programscited by 12
- 2017Physical problem solving: Joint planning with symbolic, geometric, and dynamic constraintscited by 4
- 2021Learning What To Do by Simulating the Pastcited by 4
- 2019Explaining intuitive difficulty judgments by modeling physical effort and riskcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Building Machines that Learn and Think with Peoplecited by 73
- 2024Infinite Ends from Finite Samples: Open-Ended Goal Inference as Top-Down Bayesian Filtering of Bottom-Up Proposalscited by 6
- 2024WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental modelscited by 3
- 2026Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Modelcited by 0
- 2026Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Model10 Aug 2026
- 2024Infinite Ends from Finite Samples: Open-Ended Goal Inference as Top-Down Bayesian Filtering of Bottom-Up Proposals23 Jul 2024
- 2024Building Machines that Learn and Think with People22 Jul 2024
- 2024WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models8 Mar 2024