Physical problem solving: Joint planning with symbolic, geometric, and dynamic constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present a new task that investigates how people interact with and make judgments about towers of blocks. In Experiment~1, participants in the lab solved a series of problems in which they had to re-configure three blocks from an initial to a final configuration. We recorded whether they used one hand or two hands to do so. In Experiment~2, we asked participants online to judge whether they think the person in the lab used one or two hands. The results revealed a close correspondence between participants' actions in the lab, and the mental simulations of participants online. To explain participants' actions and mental simulations, we develop a model that plans over a symbolic representation of the situation, executes the plan using a geometric solver, and checks the plan's feasibility by taking into account the physical constraints of the scene. Our model explains participants' actions and judgments to a high degree of quantitative accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Current Trendscited by 54
- 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?cited by 46
- 2023Inferring the Future by Imagining the Pastcited by 4
- 2025A simulation-heuristics dual-process model for intuitive physicscited by 1
- 2025A simulation-heuristics dual-process model for intuitive physics13 Apr 2025
- 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?6 Oct 2023
- 2023Inferring the Future by Imagining the Past26 May 2023
- 2021Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Current Trends11 May 2021