Frequency maps reveal the correlation between Adversarial Attacks and Implicit Bias
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their impressive performance in classification tasks, neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, subtle perturbations of the input data designed to deceive the model. In this work, we investigate the correlation between these perturbations and the implicit bias of neural networks trained with gradient-based algorithms. To this end, we analyse a representation of the network's implicit bias through the lens of the Fourier transform. Specifically, we identify unique fingerprints of implicit bias and adversarial attacks by calculating the minimal, essential frequencies needed for accurate classification of each image, as well as the frequencies that drive misclassification in its adversarially perturbed counterpart. This approach enables us to uncover and analyse the correlation between these essential frequencies, providing a precise map of how the network's biases align or contrast with the frequency components exploited by adversarial attacks. To this end, among other methods, we use a newly introduced technique capable of detecting nonlinear correlations between high-dimensional datasets. Our results provide empirical evidence that the network bias in Fourier space and the target frequencies of adversarial attacks are highly correlated and suggest new potential strategies for adversarial defence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
48 of 68 references.
References · 48
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
36 more
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
- 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 536
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 322
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 306
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
- 2019Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learningcited by 174
- 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
- 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
- 2022On the Implicit Bias in Deep-Learning Algorithmscited by 86
- 2022Frequency-driven Imperceptible Adversarial Attack on Semantic Similaritycited by 77
- 2019Enhanced Convolutional Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
- 2022Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputscited by 76
- 2020A Unifying View on Implicit Bias in Training Linear Neural Networkscited by 75
- 2021Scikit-dimension: a Python package for intrinsic dimension estimationcited by 68
- 2019On the Effectiveness of Low Frequency Perturbationscited by 56
- 2021Fast Minimum-norm Adversarial Attacks through Adaptive Norm Constraintscited by 50
- 2019Gradient Dynamics of Shallow Univariate ReLU Networkscited by 46
- 2022Implicit Bias in Leaky ReLU Networks Trained on High-Dimensional Datacited by 46
- 2021Spectral Bias in Practice: The Role of Function Frequency in Generalizationcited by 37
- 2018On the Structural Sensitivity of Deep Convolutional Networks to the Directions of Fourier Basis Functionscited by 32
- 2021SpectralDefense: Detecting Adversarial Attacks on CNNs in the Fourier Domaincited by 30
- 2023Benign Overfitting in Linear Classifiers and Leaky ReLU Networks from KKT Conditions for Margin Maximizationcited by 29
- 2023The Double-Edged Sword of Implicit Bias: Generalization vs. Robustness in ReLU Networkscited by 23
- 2023Understanding Multi-phase Optimization Dynamics and Rich Nonlinear Behaviors of ReLU Networkscited by 15
- 2020Shallow Univariate ReLu Networks as Splines: Initialization, Loss Surface, Hessian, & Gradient Flow Dynamicscited by 13
- 2021Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial Robustness and Optimization Biascited by 5
- 2022Understanding robustness and generalization of artificial neural networks through Fourier maskscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.