mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Faithful Low-Resource Data-to-Text Generation through Cycle Training

arXiv 2305.14793 ↗First posted 24 May 2023cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Methods to generate text from structured data have advanced significantly in recent years, primarily due to fine-tuning of pre-trained language models on large datasets. However, such models can fail to produce output faithful to the input data, particularly on out-of-domain data. Sufficient annotated data is often not available for specific domains, leading us to seek an unsupervised approach to improve the faithfulness of output text. Since the problem is fundamentally one of consistency between the representations of the structured data and text, we evaluate the effectiveness of cycle training in this work. Cycle training uses two models which are inverses of each other: one that generates text from structured data, and one which generates the structured data from natural language text. We show that cycle training, when initialized with a small amount of supervised data (100 samples in our case), achieves nearly the same performance as fully supervised approaches for the data-to-text generation task on the WebNLG, E2E, WTQ, and WSQL datasets. We perform extensive empirical analysis with automated evaluation metrics and a newly designed human evaluation schema to reveal different cycle training strategies' effectiveness of reducing various types of generation errors. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Edillower/CycleNLG.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

Builds on

22 of 44 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  7. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
  8. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  9. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
  10. 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 273
  11. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 268
  12. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
10 more
  1. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
  2. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 216
  3. 2020DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generationcited by 145
  4. 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
  5. 2016Learning Dense Correspondence via 3D-guided Cycle Consistencycited by 91
  6. 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
  7. 2020CycleGT: Unsupervised Graph-to-Text and Text-to-Graph Generation via Cycle Trainingcited by 38
  8. 2020WikiTableT: A Large-Scale Data-to-Text Dataset for Generating Wikipedia Article Sectionscited by 22
  9. 2021Few-Shot Table-to-Text Generation with Prototype Memorycited by 21
  10. 2022ASDOT: Any-Shot Data-to-Text Generation with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4.

7 papers.