mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ASDOT: Any-Shot Data-to-Text Generation with Pretrained Language Models

arXiv 2210.04325 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-to-text generation is challenging due to the great variety of the input data in terms of domains (e.g., finance vs sports) or schemata (e.g., diverse predicates). Recent end-to-end neural methods thus require substantial training examples to learn to disambiguate and describe the data. Yet, real-world data-to-text problems often suffer from various data-scarce issues: one may have access to only a handful of or no training examples, and/or have to rely on examples in a different domain or schema. To fill this gap, we propose Any-Shot Data-to-Text (ASDOT), a new approach flexibly applicable to diverse settings by making efficient use of any given (or no) examples. ASDOT consists of two steps, data disambiguation and sentence fusion, both of which are amenable to be solved with off-the-shelf pretrained language models (LMs) with optional finetuning. In the data disambiguation stage, we employ the prompted GPT-3 model to understand possibly ambiguous triples from the input data and convert each into a short sentence with reduced ambiguity. The sentence fusion stage then uses an LM like T5 to fuse all the resulting sentences into a coherent paragraph as the final description. We evaluate extensively on various datasets in different scenarios, including the zero-/few-/full-shot settings, and generalization to unseen predicates and out-of-domain data. Experimental results show that ASDOT consistently achieves significant improvement over baselines, e.g., a 30.81 BLEU gain on the DART dataset under the zero-shot setting.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2022.

Builds on

30 of 55 references.

References · 30

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  7. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  8. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  9. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
  10. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
  11. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
  12. 2020DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generationcited by 145
18 more
  1. 2015Semantically Conditioned LSTM-based Natural Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 134
  2. 2019Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs with Graph Transformerscited by 122
  3. 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
  4. 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
  5. 2018Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planningcited by 106
  6. 2020Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Taskscited by 104
  7. 2019Step-by-Step: Separating Planning from Realization in Neural Data-to-Text Generationcited by 75
  8. 2019Few-Shot NLG with Pre-Trained Language Modelcited by 52
  9. 2019Neural data-to-text generation: A comparison between pipeline and end-to-end architecturescited by 51
  10. 2019Data-to-text Generation with Entity Modelingcited by 45
  11. 2018Learning To Split and Rephrase From Wikipedia Edit Historycited by 38
  12. 2020Have Your Text and Use It Too! End-to-End Neural Data-to-Text Generation with Semantic Fidelitycited by 35
  13. 2019DiscoFuse: A Large-Scale Dataset for Discourse-Based Sentence Fusioncited by 29
  14. 2021Few-shot Knowledge Graph-to-Text Generation with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 29
  15. 2021Few-Shot Table-to-Text Generation with Prototype Memorycited by 21
  16. 2021Improving Compositional Generalization with Self-Training for Data-to-Text Generationcited by 19
  17. 2022Neural Pipeline for Zero-Shot Data-to-Text Generationcited by 19
  18. 2018Describing a Knowledge Basecited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: