When Does Monolingual Data Help Multilingual Translation: The Role of Domain and Model Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multilingual machine translation (MMT), trained on a mixture of parallel and monolingual data, is key for improving translation in low-resource language pairs. However, the literature offers conflicting results on the performance of different methods of including monolingual data. To resolve this, we examine how denoising autoencoding (DAE) and backtranslation (BT) impact MMT under different data conditions and model scales. Unlike prior studies, we use a realistic dataset of 100 translation directions and consider many domain combinations of monolingual and test data. We find that monolingual data generally helps MMT, but models are surprisingly brittle to domain mismatches, especially at smaller model scales. BT is beneficial when the parallel, monolingual, and test data sources are similar but can be detrimental otherwise, while DAE is less effective than previously reported. Next, we analyze the impact of scale (from 90M to 1.6B parameters) and find it is important for both methods, particularly DAE. As scale increases, DAE transitions from underperforming the parallel-only baseline at 90M to converging with BT performance at 1.6B, and even surpassing it in low-resource. These results offer new insights into how to best use monolingual data in MMT.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.
Builds on
47 of 58 references.
References · 47
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
35 more
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
- 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
- 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 345
- 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
- 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 292
- 2021Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 278
- 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
- 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation in the Wild: Findings and Challengescited by 253
- 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
- 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2023Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysiscited by 156
- 2022Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performancecited by 144
- 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2021Contrastive Learning for Many-to-many Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 108
- 2023The unreasonable effectiveness of few-shot learning for machine translationcited by 91
- 2016Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modelingcited by 87
- 2022Building Machine Translation Systems for the Next Thousand Languagescited by 69
- 2020TICO-19: the Translation Initiative for Covid-19cited by 67
- 2023Searching for Needles in a Haystack: On the Role of Incidental Bilingualism in PaLM's Translation Capabilitycited by 62
- 2020Leveraging Monolingual Data with Self-Supervision for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 51
- 2020Multi-task Learning for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 46
- 2023Scaling Laws for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
- 2022Examining Scaling and Transfer of Language Model Architectures for Machine Translationcited by 26
- 2022Towards the Next 1000 Languages in Multilingual Machine Translation: Exploring the Synergy Between Supervised and Self-Supervised Learningcited by 19
- 2021On the Complementarity between Pre-Training and Back-Translation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
- 2021Exploring Unsupervised Pretraining Objectives for Machine Translationcited by 3
- 2023Language-Aware Multilingual Machine Translation with Self-Supervised Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.