mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Validating Multimedia Content Moderation Software via Semantic Fusion

arXiv 2305.13623 ↗First posted 23 May 2023cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The exponential growth of social media platforms, such as Facebook and TikTok, has revolutionized communication and content publication in human society. Users on these platforms can publish multimedia content that delivers information via the combination of text, audio, images, and video. Meanwhile, the multimedia content release facility has been increasingly exploited to propagate toxic content, such as hate speech, malicious advertisements, and pornography. To this end, content moderation software has been widely deployed on these platforms to detect and blocks toxic content. However, due to the complexity of content moderation models and the difficulty of understanding information across multiple modalities, existing content moderation software can fail to detect toxic content, which often leads to extremely negative impacts. We introduce Semantic Fusion, a general, effective methodology for validating multimedia content moderation software. Our key idea is to fuse two or more existing single-modal inputs (e.g., a textual sentence and an image) into a new input that combines the semantics of its ancestors in a novel manner and has toxic nature by construction. This fused input is then used for validating multimedia content moderation software. We realized Semantic Fusion as DUO, a practical content moderation software testing tool. In our evaluation, we employ DUO to test five commercial content moderation software and two state-of-the-art models against three kinds of toxic content. The results show that DUO achieves up to 100% error finding rate (EFR) when testing moderation software. In addition, we leverage the test cases generated by DUO to retrain the two models we explored, which largely improves model robustness while maintaining the accuracy on the original test set.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.

Builds on

37 of 94 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  7. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  8. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  9. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
  10. 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 485
  11. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
  12. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
25 more
  1. 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
  2. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
  3. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  4. 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
  5. 2022Improving Adversarial Transferability via Neuron Attribution-Based Attackscited by 92
  6. 2021Leveraging Automated Unit Tests for Unsupervised Code Translationcited by 82
  7. 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
  8. 2020Metamorphic Testing: A New Approach for Generating Next Test Casescited by 71
  9. 2017Automatic Understanding of Image and Video Advertisementscited by 67
  10. 2022Multilingual HateCheck: Functional Tests for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 51
  11. 2021Hatemoji: A Test Suite and Adversarially-Generated Dataset for Benchmarking and Detecting Emoji-based Hatecited by 50
  12. 2021Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Drivingcited by 45
  13. 2023Improving the Transferability of Adversarial Samples by Path-Augmented Methodcited by 36
  14. 2019Automatic Testing and Improvement of Machine Translationcited by 35
  15. 2019Tackling Online Abuse: A Survey of Automated Abuse Detection Methodscited by 33
  16. 2018Identifying Implementation Bugs in Machine Learning based Image Classifiers using Metamorphic Testingcited by 30
  17. 2022Free Lunch for Testing: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries from Open Sourcecited by 27
  18. 2023MTTM: Metamorphic Testing for Textual Content Moderation Softwarecited by 20
  19. 2020Testing Machine Translation via Referential Transparencycited by 19
  20. 2019Testing DNN Image Classifiers for Confusion & Bias Errorscited by 17
  21. 2020SINVAD: Search-based Image Space Navigation for DNN Image Classifier Test Input Generationcited by 15
  22. 2022AEON: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of NLP Test Casescited by 15
  23. 2022Tencent's Multilingual Machine Translation System for WMT22 Large-Scale African Languagescited by 13
  24. 2022ADIMA: Abuse Detection In Multilingual Audiocited by 11
  25. 2015Applying deep learning to classify pornographic images and videoscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.