Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We give a pair of algorithms that efficiently learn a quantum state prepared by Clifford gates and O(log n) non-Clifford gates. Specifically, for an n-qubit state |psirangle prepared with at most t non-Clifford gates, our algorithms use mathsfpoly(n,2t,1/varepsilon) time and copies of |psirangle to learn |psirangle to trace distance at most varepsilon. The first algorithm for this task is more efficient, but requires entangled measurements across two copies of |psirangle. The second algorithm uses only single-copy measurements at the cost of polynomial factors in runtime and sample complexity. Our algorithms more generally learn any state with sufficiently large stabilizer dimension, where a quantum state has stabilizer dimension k if it is stabilized by an abelian group of 2k Pauli operators. We also develop an efficient property testing algorithm for stabilizer dimension, which may be of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.
Builds on
9 of 52 references.
References · 9
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 188
- 2016Efficient quantum tomography IIcited by 54
- 2023Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Samplingcited by 11
- 2019(Pseudo) Random Quantum States with Binary Phasecited by 10
- 2020Fast and robust quantum state tomography from few basis measurementscited by 10
- 2022Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase statescited by 10
- 2021Efficient Tomography of Non-Interacting Fermion Statescited by 7
- 2022Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandomcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2025Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systemscited by 10
- 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimationcited by 5
- 2024Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product Statescited by 4
- 2025Mildly-Interacting Fermionic Unitaries are Efficiently Learnablecited by 2
- 2025Learning to erase quantum states: thermodynamic implications of quantum learning theorycited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and morecited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more8 Oct 2025
- 2025Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systems5 Sep 2025
- 2025Mildly-Interacting Fermionic Unitaries are Efficiently Learnable15 Apr 2025
- 2025Learning to erase quantum states: thermodynamic implications of quantum learning theory9 Apr 2025
- 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimation16 Oct 2024
- 2024Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product States4 Apr 2024
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023