Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase states
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We analyze the complexity of learning n-qubit quantum phase states. A degree-d phase state is defined as a superposition of all 2n basis vectors x with amplitudes proportional to (-1)f(x), where f is a degree-d Boolean polynomial over n variables. We show that the sample complexity of learning an unknown degree-d phase state is Theta(nd) if we allow separable measurements and Theta(nd-1) if we allow entangled measurements. Our learning algorithm based on separable measurements has runtime textsfpoly(n) (for constant d) and is well-suited for near-term demonstrations as it requires only single-qubit measurements in the Pauli X and Z bases. We show similar bounds on the sample complexity for learning generalized phase states with complex-valued amplitudes. We further consider learning phase states when f has sparsity-s, degree-d in its mathbbF2 representation (with sample complexity O(2d sn)), f has Fourier-degree-t (with sample complexity O(22t)), and learning quadratic phase states with varepsilon-global depolarizing noise (with sample complexity O(n1+varepsilon)). These learning algorithms give us a procedure to learn the diagonal unitaries of the Clifford hierarchy and IQP~circuits.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gatescited by 7
- 2022Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandomcited by 6
- 2023On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learningcited by 5
- 2023Learning unitaries with quantum statistical queriescited by 5
- 2024Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product Statescited by 4
- 2024Learning low-degree quantum objectscited by 2
- 2024Testing classical properties from quantum datacited by 2
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates II: Single-Copy Measurementscited by 0
- 2025Learning to erase quantum states: thermodynamic implications of quantum learning theorycited by 0
- 2025Learning to erase quantum states: thermodynamic implications of quantum learning theory9 Apr 2025
- 2024Testing classical properties from quantum data19 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning low-degree quantum objects17 May 2024
- 2024Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product States4 Apr 2024
- 2023Learning unitaries with quantum statistical queries3 Oct 2023
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates II: Single-Copy Measurements14 Aug 2023
- 2023On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learning5 Jun 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates22 May 2023
- 2022Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom29 Sep 2022