Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the complexity of learning quantum states in various models with respect to the stabilizer formalism and obtain the following results: - We prove that Omega(n) T-gates are necessary for any Clifford+T circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, an exponential improvement over the previously known bound. This bound is asymptotically tight if linear-time quantum-secure pseudorandom functions exist. - Given an n-qubit pure quantum state |psirangle that has fidelity at least τ with some stabilizer state, we give an algorithm that outputs a succinct description of a stabilizer state that witnesses fidelity at least τ - varepsilon. The algorithm uses O(n/(varepsilon2τ4)) samples and expleft(O(n/τ4)right) / varepsilon2 time. In the regime of τ constant, this algorithm estimates stabilizer fidelity substantially faster than the na"ive exp(O(n2))-time brute-force algorithm over all stabilizer states. - In the special case of τ > cos2(π/8), we show that a modification of the above algorithm runs in polynomial time. - We exhibit a tolerant property testing algorithm for stabilizer states. The underlying algorithmic primitive in all of our results is Bell difference sampling. To prove our results, we establish and/or strengthen connections between Bell difference sampling, symplectic Fourier analysis, and graph theory.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 3.
11 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2024Learning shallow quantum circuitscited by 20
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gatescited by 7
- 2024Hamiltonian Property Testingcited by 6
- 2024Stabilizer bootstrapping: A recipe for efficient agnostic tomography and magic estimationcited by 5
- 2024Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product Statescited by 4
- 2024Testing classical properties from quantum datacited by 2
- 2025Mildly-Interacting Fermionic Unitaries are Efficiently Learnablecited by 2
- 2025Efficient learning of bosonic Gaussian unitariescited by 1
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates II: Single-Copy Measurementscited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and morecited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more8 Oct 2025
- 2025Efficient learning of bosonic Gaussian unitaries7 Oct 2025
- 2025Mildly-Interacting Fermionic Unitaries are Efficiently Learnable15 Apr 2025
- 2024Testing classical properties from quantum data19 Nov 2024
- 2024Stabilizer bootstrapping: A recipe for efficient agnostic tomography and magic estimation13 Aug 2024
- 2024Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product States4 Apr 2024
- 2024Hamiltonian Property Testing5 Mar 2024
- 2024Learning shallow quantum circuits18 Jan 2024
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates II: Single-Copy Measurements14 Aug 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2023Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates22 May 2023