mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom

arXiv 2209.14530 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2022quant-ph cs.CC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that quantum states with "low stabilizer complexity" can be efficiently distinguished from Haar-random. Specifically, given an n-qubit pure state |psirangle, we give an efficient algorithm that distinguishes whether |psirangle is (i) Haar-random or (ii) a state with stabilizer fidelity at least frac1k (i.e., has fidelity at least frac1k with some stabilizer state), promised that one of these is the case. With black-box access to |psirangle, our algorithm uses O!left( k12 log(1/δ)right) copies of |psirangle and O!left(n k12 log(1/δ)right) time to succeed with probability at least 1-δ, and, with access to a state preparation unitary for |psirangle (and its inverse), O!left( k3 log(1/δ)right) queries and O!left(n k3 log(1/δ)right) time suffice. As a corollary, we prove that ω(log(n)) T-gates are necessary for any Clifford+T circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, a first-of-its-kind lower bound.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2022.

Builds on

3 of 29 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
  2. 2019(Pseudo) Random Quantum States with Binary Phasecited by 10
  3. 2022Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase statescited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

6 papers.