mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Single-Leg Revenue Management with Advice

arXiv 2202.10939 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2022cs.GT cs.DS cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Single-leg revenue management is a foundational problem of revenue management that has been particularly impactful in the airline and hotel industry: Given n units of a resource, e.g. flight seats, and a stream of sequentially-arriving customers segmented by fares, what is the optimal online policy for allocating the resource. Previous work focused on designing algorithms when forecasts are available, which are not robust to inaccuracies in the forecast, or online algorithms with worst-case performance guarantees, which can be too conservative in practice. In this work, we look at the single-leg revenue management problem through the lens of the algorithms-with-advice framework, which attempts to harness the increasing prediction accuracy of machine learning methods by optimally incorporating advice about the future into online algorithms. In particular, we characterize the Pareto frontier that captures the tradeoff between consistency (performance when advice is accurate) and competitiveness (performance when advice is inaccurate) for every advice. Moreover, we provide an online algorithm that always achieves performance on this Pareto frontier. We also study the class of protection level policies, which is the most widely-deployed technique for single-leg revenue management: we provide an algorithm to incorporate advice into protection levels that optimally trades off consistency and competitiveness. Moreover, we empirically evaluate the performance of these algorithms on synthetic data. We find that our algorithm for protection level policies performs remarkably well on most instances, even if it is not guaranteed to be on the Pareto frontier in theory. Our results extend to other unit-cost online allocations problems such as the display advertising and the multiple secretary problem together with more general variable-cost problems such as the online knapsack problem.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2022.

Builds on

11 of 40 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
  2. 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 152
  3. 2019Near-Optimal Bounds for Online Caching with Machine Learned Advicecited by 73
  4. 2020Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advicecited by 71
  5. 2019A Model for Learned Bloom Filters, and Optimizing by Sandwichingcited by 64
  6. 2021Faster Matchings via Learned Dualscited by 56
  7. 2020Secretaries with Advicecited by 41
  8. 2020Queues with Small Advicecited by 9
  9. 2017Online Allocation with Traffic Spikes: Mixing Adversarial and Stochastic Modelscited by 6
  10. 2018Online Resource Allocation under Partially Predictable Demandcited by 3
  11. 2018On Policies for Single-leg Revenue Management with Limited Demand Informationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

9 papers.