mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causality-Aided Trade-off Analysis for Machine Learning Fairness

arXiv 2305.13057 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LG cs.SEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There has been an increasing interest in enhancing the fairness of machine learning (ML). Despite the growing number of fairness-improving methods, we lack a systematic understanding of the trade-offs among factors considered in the ML pipeline when fairness-improving methods are applied. This understanding is essential for developers to make informed decisions regarding the provision of fair ML services. Nonetheless, it is extremely difficult to analyze the trade-offs when there are multiple fairness parameters and other crucial metrics involved, coupled, and even in conflict with one another. This paper uses causality analysis as a principled method for analyzing trade-offs between fairness parameters and other crucial metrics in ML pipelines. To ractically and effectively conduct causality analysis, we propose a set of domain-specific optimizations to facilitate accurate causal discovery and a unified, novel interface for trade-off analysis based on well-established causal inference methods. We conduct a comprehensive empirical study using three real-world datasets on a collection of widelyused fairness-improving techniques. Our study obtains actionable suggestions for users and developers of fair ML. We further demonstrate the versatile usage of our approach in selecting the optimal fairness-improving method, paving the way for more ethical and socially responsible AI technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

42 of 85 references.

References · 42

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  5. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  9. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  10. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  11. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  12. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
30 more
  1. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  2. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  3. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 215
  4. 2020Torchattacks: A PyTorch Repository for Adversarial Attackscited by 158
  5. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  6. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  7. 2021DiBS: Differentiable Bayesian Structure Learningcited by 106
  8. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  9. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 93
  10. 2013Learning Gaussian Networkscited by 62
  11. 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
  12. 2022Causality-based Neural Network Repaircited by 47
  13. 2016Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Causal Parameterscited by 43
  14. 2013Parameter Priors for Directed Acyclic Graphical Models and the Characterization of Several Probability Distributionscited by 42
  15. 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
  16. 2022Fairness-aware Configuration of Machine Learning Librariescited by 28
  17. 2018Causal Testing: Finding Defects' Root Causescited by 22
  18. 2022FairNeuron: Improving Deep Neural Network Fairness with Adversary Games on Selective Neuronscited by 21
  19. 2021FairMask: Better Fairness via Model-based Rebalancing of Protected Attributescited by 19
  20. 2022Adaptive Fairness Improvement Based on Causality Analysiscited by 17
  21. 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Generalization: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
  22. 2021Fair Enough: Searching for Sufficient Measures of Fairnesscited by 14
  23. 2022Causality in Configurable Software Systemscited by 13
  24. 2016Are Accuracy and Robustness Correlated?cited by 11
  25. 2023Information-Theoretic Testing and Debugging of Fairness Defects in Deep Neural Networkscited by 10
  26. 2022XInsight: eXplainable Data Analysis Through The Lens of Causalitycited by 9
  27. 2023"Oops, Did I Just Say That?" Testing and Repairing Unethical Suggestions of Large Language Models with Suggest-Critique-Reflect Processcited by 9
  28. 2021Improving Fault Localization by Integrating Value and Predicate Based Causal Inference Techniquescited by 8
  29. 2022PerfCE: Performance Debugging on Databases with Chaos Engineering-Enhanced Causality Analysiscited by 8
  30. 2023To be Robust and to be Fair: Aligning Fairness with Robustnesscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.