The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Human and Machine Translations for Multilingual Semantic Parsing with Active Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multilingual semantic parsing aims to leverage the knowledge from the high-resource languages to improve low-resource semantic parsing, yet commonly suffers from the data imbalance problem. Prior works propose to utilize the translations by either humans or machines to alleviate such issues. However, human translations are expensive, while machine translations are cheap but prone to error and bias. In this work, we propose an active learning approach that exploits the strengths of both human and machine translations by iteratively adding small batches of human translations into the machine-translated training set. Besides, we propose novel aggregated acquisition criteria that help our active learning method select utterances to be manually translated. Our experiments demonstrate that an ideal utterance selection can significantly reduce the error and bias in the translated data, resulting in higher parser accuracies than the parsers merely trained on the machine-translated data.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.
Builds on
21 of 55 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2016Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 217
- 2018Scaling Neural Machine Translationcited by 204
- 2020MTOP: A Comprehensive Multilingual Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing Benchmarkcited by 156
- 2018Coarse-to-Fine Decoding for Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 110
- 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 88
- 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
- 2023On Robustness of Prompt-based Semantic Parsing with Large Pre-trained Language Model: An Empirical Study on Codexcited by 41
- 2020AutoQA: From Databases To QA Semantic Parsers With Only Synthetic Training Datacited by 29
9 more
- 2023Document Flattening: Beyond Concatenating Context for Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 15
- 2021On Robustness of Neural Semantic Parserscited by 14
- 2020Bootstrapping a Crosslingual Semantic Parsercited by 13
- 2021Phrase-level Active Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 13
- 2019Merging Weak and Active Supervision for Semantic Parsingcited by 11
- 2021Total Recall: a Customized Continual Learning Method for Neural Semantic Parserscited by 9
- 2022Paraphrasing Techniques for Maritime QA systemcited by 7
- 2023Active Learning for Multilingual Semantic Parsercited by 3
- 2018Learning Cross-lingual Distributed Logical Representations for Semantic Parsingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 53
- 2024SCAR: Data Selection via Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking for Efficient Instruction-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025DiscoSG: Towards Discourse-Level Text Scene Graph Parsing through Iterative Graph Refinementcited by 1
- 2025DiscoSG: Towards Discourse-Level Text Scene Graph Parsing through Iterative Graph Refinement18 Jun 2025
- 2024SCAR: Data Selection via Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking for Efficient Instruction-Tuning of Large Language Models16 Jun 2024
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontiers1 May 2024