FAQ: Mitigating the Impact of Faults in the Weight Memory of DNN Accelerators through Fault-Aware Quantization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Permanent faults induced due to imperfections in the manufacturing process of Deep Neural Network (DNN) accelerators are a major concern, as they negatively impact the manufacturing yield of the chip fabrication process. Fault-aware training is the state-of-the-art approach for mitigating such faults. However, it incurs huge retraining overheads, specifically when used for large DNNs trained on complex datasets. To address this issue, we propose a novel Fault-Aware Quantization (FAQ) technique for mitigating the effects of stuck-at permanent faults in the on-chip weight memory of DNN accelerators at a negligible overhead cost compared to fault-aware retraining while offering comparable accuracy results. We propose a lookup table-based algorithm to achieve ultra-low model conversion time. We present extensive evaluation of the proposed approach using five different DNNs, i.e., ResNet-18, VGG11, VGG16, AlexNet and MobileNetV2, and three different datasets, i.e., CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet. The results demonstrate that FAQ helps in maintaining the baseline accuracy of the DNNs at low and moderate fault rates without involving costly fault-aware training. For example, for ResNet-18 trained on the CIFAR-10 dataset, at 0.04 fault rate FAQ offers (on average) an increase of 76.38% in accuracy. Similarly, for VGG11 trained on the CIFAR-10 dataset, at 0.04 fault rate FAQ offers (on average) an increase of 70.47% in accuracy. The results also show that FAQ incurs negligible overheads, i.e., less than 5% of the time required to run 1 epoch of retraining. We additionally demonstrate the efficacy of our technique when used in conjunction with fault-aware retraining and show that the use of FAQ inside fault-aware retraining enables fast accuracy recovery.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2023.
Builds on
6 of 32 references.
References · 6
- 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 618
- 2017Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Surveycited by 434
- 2020Hardware and Software Optimizations for Accelerating Deep Neural Networks: Survey of Current Trends, Challenges, and the Road Aheadcited by 34
- 2018Analyzing and Mitigating the Impact of Permanent Faults on a Systolic Array Based Neural Network Acceleratorcited by 25
- 2019EDEN: Enabling Energy-Efficient, High-Performance Deep Neural Network Inference Using Approximate DRAMcited by 24
- 2020FAT: Training Neural Networks for Reliable Inference Under Hardware Faultscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Exploration of Activation Fault Reliability in Quantized Systolic Array-Based DNN Accelerators
- 2024Memory Faults in Activation-sparse Quantized Deep Neural Networks: Analysis and Mitigation using Sharpness-aware Training
- 2026REQAP: Resilient Weight Packing and Quantization for Edge DNN Acceleration
- 2026PhD Thesis Summary: Methods for Reliability Assessment and Enhancement of Deep Neural Network Hardware Accelerators
- 2022FlatENN: Train Flat for Enhanced Fault Tolerance of Quantized Deep Neural Networks
- 2026SPINE: A Fault Injection Profiler for Quantized Neural Networks under Accumulated Faults
- 2026RESQ: A Unified Framework for REliability- and Security Enhancement of Quantized Deep Neural Networks
- 2023Cross-Layer Optimization for Fault-Tolerant Deep Learning