mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FlatENN: Train Flat for Enhanced Fault Tolerance of Quantized Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2301.00675 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.ARcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model compression via quantization and sparsity enhancement has gained an immense interest to enable the deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) in resource-constrained edge environments. Although these techniques have shown promising results in reducing the energy, latency and memory requirements of the DNNs, their performance in non-ideal real-world settings (such as in the presence of hardware faults) is yet to be completely understood. In this paper, we investigate the impact of bit-flip and stuck-at faults on activation-sparse quantized DNNs (QDNNs). We show that a high level of activation sparsity comes at the cost of larger vulnerability to faults. For instance, activation-sparse QDNNs exhibit up to 17.32% lower accuracy than the standard QDNNs. We also establish that one of the major cause of the degraded accuracy is sharper minima in the loss landscape for activation-sparse QDNNs, which makes them more sensitive to perturbations in the weight values due to faults. Based on this observation, we propose the mitigation of the impact of faults by employing a sharpness-aware quantization (SAQ) training scheme. The activation-sparse and standard QDNNs trained with SAQ have up to 36.71% and 24.76% higher inference accuracy, respectively compared to their conventionally trained equivalents. Moreover, we show that SAQ-trained activation-sparse QDNNs show better accuracy in faulty settings than standard QDNNs trained conventionally. Thus the proposed technique can be instrumental in achieving sparsity-related energy/latency benefits without compromising on fault tolerance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2022.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  5. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  6. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  7. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  8. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  9. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
  10. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  11. 2018LQ-Nets: Learned Quantization for Highly Accurate and Compact Deep Neural Networkscited by 272
  12. 2017Learning to Prune Deep Neural Networks via Layer-wise Optimal Brain Surgeoncited by 219
6 more
  1. 2019Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault Attackscited by 55
  2. 2018Accelerating Convolutional Neural Networks via Activation Map Compressioncited by 34
  3. 2021Sharpness-aware Quantization for Deep Neural Networkscited by 25
  4. 2020FAT: Training Neural Networks for Reliable Inference Under Hardware Faultscited by 15
  5. 2021Improving DNN Fault Tolerance using Weight Pruning and Differential Crossbar Mapping for ReRAM-based Edge AIcited by 10
  6. 2022Examining and Mitigating the Impact of Crossbar Non-idealities for Accurate Implementation of Sparse Deep Neural Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.