mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Embrace Limited and Imperfect Training Datasets: Opportunities and Challenges in Plant Disease Recognition Using Deep Learning

arXiv 2305.11533 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in deep learning have brought significant improvements to plant disease recognition. However, achieving satisfactory performance often requires high-quality training datasets, which are challenging and expensive to collect. Consequently, the practical application of current deep learning-based methods in real-world scenarios is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality datasets. In this paper, we argue that embracing poor datasets is viable and aim to explicitly define the challenges associated with using these datasets. To delve into this topic, we analyze the characteristics of high-quality datasets, namely large-scale images and desired annotation, and contrast them with the limited and imperfect nature of poor datasets. Challenges arise when the training datasets deviate from these characteristics. To provide a comprehensive understanding, we propose a novel and informative taxonomy that categorizes these challenges. Furthermore, we offer a brief overview of existing studies and approaches that address these challenges. We believe that our paper sheds light on the importance of embracing poor datasets, enhances the understanding of the associated challenges, and contributes to the ambitious objective of deploying deep learning in real-world applications. To facilitate the progress, we finally describe several outstanding questions and point out potential future directions. Although our primary focus is on plant disease recognition, we emphasize that the principles of embracing and analyzing poor datasets are applicable to a wider range of domains, including agriculture.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

43 of 103 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  7. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  8. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  9. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  10. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  11. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  12. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
31 more
  1. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  2. 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
  3. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
  4. 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
  5. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
  6. 2016Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detectioncited by 216
  7. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  8. 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
  9. 2021Adversarial Reciprocal Points Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 153
  10. 2021Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 121
  11. 2019Imbalance Problems in Object Detection: A Reviewcited by 118
  12. 2020Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognitioncited by 109
  13. 2020Conditional Gaussian Distribution Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 104
  14. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  15. 2020A Survey of Deep Meta-Learningcited by 99
  16. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learningcited by 95
  17. 2022MVP: Multimodality-guided Visual Pre-trainingcited by 92
  18. 2021Weakly Supervised Object Localization and Detection: A Surveycited by 84
  19. 2020CompRess: Self-Supervised Learning by Compressing Representationscited by 61
  20. 2022What Makes Transfer Learning Work For Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other Factorscited by 61
  21. 2022The Familiarity Hypothesis: Explaining the Behavior of Deep Open Set Methodscited by 28
  22. 2022Class-Specific Semantic Reconstruction for Open Set Recognitioncited by 28
  23. 2022Robust Object Detection With Inaccurate Bounding Boxescited by 20
  24. 2020LeafGAN: An Effective Data Augmentation Method for Practical Plant Disease Diagnosiscited by 18
  25. 2019Unsupervised Image Translation using Adversarial Networks for Improved Plant Disease Recognitioncited by 8
  26. 2020Plant Diseases recognition on images using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Systematic Reviewcited by 6
  27. 2022Narrowing the Gap: Improved Detector Training with Noisy Location Annotationscited by 6
  28. 2021Multi-Domain Few-Shot Learning and Dataset for Agricultural Applicationscited by 3
  29. 2021Weakly Supervised Attention-based Models Using Activation Maps for Citrus Mite and Insect Pest Classificationcited by 3
  30. 2020Rectified Meta-Learning from Noisy Labels for Robust Image-based Plant Disease Diagnosiscited by 2
  31. 2020How useful is Active Learning for Image-based Plant Phenotyping?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

4 papers.