Spatial-Frequency Discriminability for Revealing Adversarial Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial perturbations has been widely perceived in the computer vision community. From a security perspective, it poses a critical risk for modern vision systems, e.g., the popular Deep Learning as a Service (DLaaS) frameworks. For protecting deep models while not modifying them, current algorithms typically detect adversarial patterns through discriminative decomposition for natural and adversarial data. However, these decompositions are either biased towards frequency resolution or spatial resolution, thus failing to capture adversarial patterns comprehensively. Also, when the detector relies on few fixed features, it is practical for an adversary to fool the model while evading the detector (i.e., defense-aware attack). Motivated by such facts, we propose a discriminative detector relying on a spatial-frequency Krawtchouk decomposition. It expands the above works from two aspects: 1) the introduced Krawtchouk basis provides better spatial-frequency discriminability, capturing the differences between natural and adversarial data comprehensively in both spatial and frequency distributions, w.r.t. the common trigonometric or wavelet basis; 2) the extensive features formed by the Krawtchouk decomposition allows for adaptive feature selection and secrecy mechanism, significantly increasing the difficulty of the defense-aware attack, w.r.t. the detector with few fixed features. Theoretical and numerical analyses demonstrate the uniqueness and usefulness of our detector, exhibiting competitive scores on several deep models and image sets against a variety of adversarial attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2023.
Builds on
44 of 76 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
32 more
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
- 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 334
- 2014Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embeddingcited by 288
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 245
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
- 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2017Fast Feature Fool: A data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbationscited by 66
- 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Image Examples in Deep Networks with Adaptive Noise Reductioncited by 49
- 2017Defense against Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 48
- 2017Enhancing Robustness of Machine Learning Systems via Data Transformationscited by 38
- 2022Natural Color Fool: Towards Boosting Black-box Unrestricted Attackscited by 38
- 2021Exploring Misclassifications of Robust Neural Networks to Enhance Adversarial Attackscited by 33
- 2018Detection based Defense against Adversarial Examples from the Steganalysis Point of Viewcited by 32
- 2019VeriML: Enabling Integrity Assurances and Fair Payments for Machine Learning as a Servicecited by 28
- 2021Towards Robust Neural Image Compression: Adversarial Attack and Model Finetuningcited by 25
- 2017Biologically inspired protection of deep networks from adversarial attackscited by 23
- 2022Double Bubble, Toil and Trouble: Enhancing Certified Robustness through Transitivitycited by 15
- 2019Comment on "Adv-BNN: Improved Adversarial Defense through Robust Bayesian Neural Network"cited by 12
- 2021A Survey of Orthogonal Moments for Image Representation: Theory, Implementation, and Evaluationcited by 8
- 2022A Principled Design of Image Representation: Towards Forensic Taskscited by 8
- 2022Self-recoverable Adversarial Examples: A New Effective Protection Mechanism in Social Networkscited by 6
- 2018Secure Detection of Image Manipulation by means of Random Feature Selectioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.