mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Private Training Set Inspection in MLaaS

arXiv 2305.09058 ↗First posted 15 May 2023cs.LG cs.CY cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) is a popular cloud-based solution for customers who aim to use an ML model but lack training data, computation resources, or expertise in ML. In this case, the training datasets are typically a private possession of the ML or data companies and are inaccessible to the customers, but the customers still need an approach to confirm that the training datasets meet their expectations and fulfil regulatory measures like fairness. However, no existing work addresses the above customers' concerns. This work is the first attempt to solve this problem, taking data origin as an entry point. We first define origin membership measurement and based on this, we then define diversity and fairness metrics to address customers' concerns. We then propose a strategy to estimate the values of these two metrics in the inaccessible training dataset, combining shadow training techniques from membership inference and an efficient featurization scheme in multiple instance learning. The evaluation contains an application of text review polarity classification applications based on the language BERT model. Experimental results show that our solution can achieve up to 0.87 accuracy for membership inspection and up to 99.3% confidence in inspecting diversity and fairness distribution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  4. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  5. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 388
  6. 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 271
  7. 2019Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership Inferencecited by 175
  8. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  9. 2019The Audio Auditor: User-Level Membership Inference in Internet of Things Voice Servicescited by 25
  10. 2019Privacy Enhanced Multimodal Neural Representations for Emotion Recognitioncited by 22
  11. 2021Property Inference Attacks on Convolutional Neural Networks: Influence and Implications of Target Model's Complexitycited by 19
  12. 2018Gradient-Leaks: Understanding and Controlling Deanonymization in Federated Learningcited by 15
4 more
  1. 2019Provenance Data in the Machine Learning Lifecycle in Computational Science and Engineeringcited by 13
  2. 2021Correlation inference attacks against machine learning modelscited by 7
  3. 2021Formalizing Distribution Inference Riskscited by 3
  4. 2022Data Origin Inference in Machine Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023ERASER: Machine Unlearning in MLaaS via an Inference Serving-Aware Approach
  2. 2026inLoRA-MINT: Internal Representations for Auditing Training Data in Domain-adapted LLMs
  3. 2023FairSISA: Ensemble Post-Processing to Improve Fairness of Unlearning in LLMs
  4. 2022FEAMOE: Fair, Explainable and Adaptive Mixture of Experts
  5. 2026Privacy Cost as Equity Input: A Group Fairness Criterion for Differentially Private Machine Learning
  6. 2022Towards Multi-Objective Statistically Fair Federated Learning
  7. 2025BiasGuard: Guardrailing Fairness in Machine Learning Production Systems
  8. 2024Nob-MIAs: Non-biased Membership Inference Attacks Assessment on Large Language Models with Ex-Post Dataset Construction