BiasGuard: Guardrailing Fairness in Machine Learning Production Systems
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning (ML) systems increasingly impact critical sectors such as hiring, financial risk assessments, and criminal justice, the imperative to ensure fairness has intensified due to potential negative implications. While much ML fairness research has focused on enhancing training data and processes, addressing the outputs of already deployed systems has received less attention. This paper introduces 'BiasGuard', a novel approach designed to act as a fairness guardrail in production ML systems. BiasGuard leverages Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) powered by Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (CTGAN), a cutting-edge generative AI model, to synthesize data samples conditioned on inverted protected attribute values, thereby promoting equitable outcomes across diverse groups. This method aims to provide equal opportunities for both privileged and unprivileged groups while significantly enhancing the fairness metrics of deployed systems without the need for retraining. Our comprehensive experimental analysis across diverse datasets reveals that BiasGuard enhances fairness by 31% while only reducing accuracy by 0.09% compared to non-mitigated benchmarks. Additionally, BiasGuard outperforms existing post-processing methods in improving fairness, positioning it as an effective tool to safeguard against biases when retraining the model is impractical.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2025.
Builds on
17 of 35 references.
References · 17
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
- 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
- 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 94
- 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
- 2016A statistical framework for fair predictive algorithmscited by 37
5 more
- 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
- 2023Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"cited by 15
- 2019Generative Adversarial Networks for Mitigating Biases in Machine Learning Systemscited by 5
- 2021Boosting Anomaly Detection Using Unsupervised Diverse Test-Time Augmentationcited by 1
- 2024Improving Fairness in Credit Lending Models using Subgroup Threshold Optimizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.