mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamically Conservative Self-Driving Planner for Long-Tail Cases

arXiv 2305.07497 ↗First posted 12 May 2023cs.RO cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-driving vehicles (SDVs) are becoming reality but still suffer from "long-tail" challenges during natural driving: the SDVs will continually encounter rare, safety-critical cases that may not be included in the dataset they were trained. Some safety-assurance planners solve this problem by being conservative in all possible cases, which may significantly affect driving mobility. To this end, this work proposes a method to automatically adjust the conservative level according to each case's "long-tail" rate, named dynamically conservative planner (DCP). We first define the "long-tail" rate as an SDV's confidence to pass a driving case. The rate indicates the probability of safe-critical events and is estimated using the statistics bootstrapped method with historical data. Then, a reinforcement learning-based planner is designed to contain candidate policies with different conservative levels. The final policy is optimized based on the estimated "long-tail" rate. In this way, the DCP is designed to automatically adjust to be more conservative in low-confidence "long-tail" cases while keeping efficient otherwise. The DCP is evaluated in the CARLA simulator using driving cases with "long-tail" distributed training data. The results show that the DCP can accurately estimate the "long-tail" rate to identify potential risks. Based on the rate, the DCP automatically avoids potential collisions in "long-tail" cases using conservative decisions while not affecting the average velocity in other typical cases. Thus, the DCP is safer and more efficient than the baselines with fixed conservative levels, e.g., an always conservative planner. This work provides a technique to guarantee SDV's performance in unexpected driving cases without resorting to a global conservative setting, which contributes to solving the "long-tail" problem practically.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2023.

Builds on

17 of 42 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  2. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 809
  3. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
  4. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
  5. 2019Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-Shot Learningcited by 463
  6. 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 417
  7. 2021Improving Calibration for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 212
  8. 2018Model-Based Value Estimation for Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
  9. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
  10. 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 105
  11. 2021FASA: Feature Augmentation and Sampling Adaptation for Long-Tailed Instance Segmentationcited by 76
  12. 2021A Survey of Deep RL and IL for Autonomous Driving Policy Learningcited by 61
5 more
  1. 2020Waymo Public Road Safety Performance Datacited by 24
  2. 2022Long-Tail Prediction Uncertainty Aware Trajectory Planning for Self-driving Vehiclescited by 22
  3. 2017Deep Predictive Models for Collision Risk Assessment in Autonomous Drivingcited by 15
  4. 2018Is it Safe to Drive? An Overview of Factors, Challenges, and Datasets for Driveability Assessment in Autonomous Drivingcited by 11
  5. 2020Prediction-Based Reachability for Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Drivingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 9.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Reinforcement Learning Based Safe Decision Making for Highway Autonomous Driving
  2. 2019Review of Learning-based Longitudinal Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles: Research Gaps between Self-driving and Traffic Congestion
  3. 2022Safe Real-World Autonomous Driving by Learning to Predict and Plan with a Mixture of Experts
  4. 2024Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2021Safe Imitation Learning on Real-Life Highway Data for Human-like Autonomous Driving
  6. 2024Data Scaling Laws for Imitation Learning-Based End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  7. 2020Safe Trajectory Planning Using Reinforcement Learning for Self Driving
  8. 2024Sparsity-based Safety Conservatism for Constrained Offline Reinforcement Learning