mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A review on competing risks methods for survival analysis

arXiv 2212.05157 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2022stat.MEcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When modelling competing risks survival data, several techniques have been proposed in both the statistical and machine learning literature. State-of-the-art methods have extended classical approaches with more flexible assumptions that can improve predictive performance, allow high dimensional data and missing values, among others. Despite this, modern approaches have not been widely employed in applied settings. This article aims to aid the uptake of such methods by providing a condensed compendium of competing risks survival methods with a unified notation and interpretation across approaches. We highlight available software and, when possible, demonstrate their usage via reproducible R vignettes. Moreover, we discuss two major concerns that can affect benchmark studies in this context: the choice of performance metrics and reproducibility.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3.

4 papers.