A review on competing risks methods for survival analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When modelling competing risks survival data, several techniques have been proposed in both the statistical and machine learning literature. State-of-the-art methods have extended classical approaches with more flexible assumptions that can improve predictive performance, allow high dimensional data and missing values, among others. Despite this, modern approaches have not been widely employed in applied settings. This article aims to aid the uptake of such methods by providing a condensed compendium of competing risks survival methods with a unified notation and interpretation across approaches. We highlight available software and, when possible, demonstrate their usage via reproducible R vignettes. Moreover, we discuss two major concerns that can affect benchmark studies in this context: the choice of performance metrics and reproducibility.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3.
4 papers.
- 2023Neural Fine-Gray: Monotonic neural networks for competing riskscited by 20
- 2024Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Riskscited by 6
- 2024Teaching Models To Survive: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Riskscited by 0
- 2024Prognostics for Autonomous Deep-Space Habitat Health Management under Multiple Unknown Failure Modescited by 0
- 2024Prognostics for Autonomous Deep-Space Habitat Health Management under Multiple Unknown Failure Modes19 Nov 2024
- 2024Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks22 Oct 2024
- 2024Teaching Models To Survive: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks20 Jun 2024
- 2023Neural Fine-Gray: Monotonic neural networks for competing risks11 May 2023