Effects of sub-word segmentation on performance of transformer language models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language modeling is a fundamental task in natural language processing, which has been thoroughly explored with various architectures and hyperparameters. However, few studies focus on the effect of sub-word segmentation on the performance of language models (LMs). In this paper, we compare GPT and BERT models trained with the statistical segmentation algorithm BPE vs. two unsupervised algorithms for morphological segmentation -- Morfessor and StateMorph. We train the models for several languages -- including ones with very rich morphology -- and compare their performance with different segmentation algorithms, vocabulary sizes, and model sizes. The results show that training with morphological segmentation allows the LMs to: 1. achieve lower perplexity, 2. converge more efficiently in terms of training time, and 3. achieve equivalent or better evaluation scores on downstream tasks. Lastly, we show 4. that LMs of smaller size using morphological segmentation can perform comparably to models of larger size trained with BPE -- both in terms of (1) perplexity and (3) scores on downstream tasks. Points (2) and (4) impact on sustainability of LMs, since they reduce the model cost: size and computation time. While (2) reduces cost only in the training phase, (4) does so also in the inference phase.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2023.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 632
- 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
- 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 189
- 2022Towards a Cleaner Document-Oriented Multilingual Crawled Corpuscited by 143
11 more
- 2019Well-Read Students Learn Better: On the Importance of Pre-training Compact Modelscited by 118
- 2019Multilingual is not enough: BERT for Finnishcited by 118
- 2014On Using Very Large Target Vocabulary for Neural Machine Translationcited by 80
- 2021Superbizarre Is Not Superb: Derivational Morphology Improves BERT's Interpretation of Complex Wordscited by 63
- 2022Impact of Tokenization on Language Models: An Analysis for Turkishcited by 62
- 2020Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysiscited by 37
- 2021Why don't people use character-level machine translation?cited by 27
- 2022RuCoLA: Russian Corpus of Linguistic Acceptabilitycited by 26
- 2022The SIGMORPHON 2022 Shared Task on Morpheme Segmentationcited by 25
- 2020Morfessor EM+Prune: Improved Subword Segmentation with Expectation Maximization and Pruningcited by 11
- 2021Finnish Paraphrase Corpuscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2024MYTE: Morphology-Driven Byte Encoding for Better and Fairer Multilingual Language Modelingcited by 40
- 2024The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concernscited by 20
- 2025Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignmentcited by 9
- 2025TokSuite: Measuring the Impact of Tokenizer Choice on Language Model Behaviorcited by 4
- 2026AdaptBPE: From General Purpose to Specialized Tokenizerscited by 3
- 2026Phonemes to the Rescue: Multilingual Tokenization Based on International Phonetic Alphabetcited by 2
- 2024Unsupervised Morphological Tree Tokenizercited by 0
- 2025Tokenization Multiplicity Leads to Arbitrary Price Variation in LLM-as-a-servicecited by 0
- 2025MoVoC: Morphology-Aware Subword Construction for Geez Script Languagescited by 0
- 2025Prior-based Noisy Text Data Filtering: Fast and Strong Alternative For Perplexitycited by 0
- 2025LIME: Making LLM Data More Efficient with Linguistic Metadata Embeddingscited by 0
- 2026MoirfEolas and Cr'iochScore: Developing Resources for and the Evaluation of Tokenization Alignment with Irish Morphologycited by 0
- 2026MoirfEolas and Cr'iochScore: Developing Resources for and the Evaluation of Tokenization Alignment with Irish Morphology4 Sep 2026
- 2026Phonemes to the Rescue: Multilingual Tokenization Based on International Phonetic Alphabet18 Jun 2026
- 2026AdaptBPE: From General Purpose to Specialized Tokenizers29 Jan 2026
- 2025TokSuite: Measuring the Impact of Tokenizer Choice on Language Model Behavior23 Dec 2025
- 2025LIME: Making LLM Data More Efficient with Linguistic Metadata Embeddings8 Dec 2025
- 2025Prior-based Noisy Text Data Filtering: Fast and Strong Alternative For Perplexity23 Sep 2025
- 2025MoVoC: Morphology-Aware Subword Construction for Geez Script Languages10 Sep 2025
- 2025Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignment11 Aug 2025
- 2025Tokenization Multiplicity Leads to Arbitrary Price Variation in LLM-as-a-service6 Jun 2025
- 2024The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns16 Jul 2024
- 2024Unsupervised Morphological Tree Tokenizer21 Jun 2024
- 2024MYTE: Morphology-Driven Byte Encoding for Better and Fairer Multilingual Language Modeling15 Mar 2024