Adaptive loose optimization for robust question answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Question answering methods are well-known for leveraging data bias, such as the language prior in visual question answering and the position bias in machine reading comprehension (extractive question answering). Current debiasing methods often come at the cost of significant in-distribution performance to achieve favorable out-of-distribution generalizability, while non-debiasing methods sacrifice a considerable amount of out-of-distribution performance in order to obtain high in-distribution performance. Therefore, it is challenging for them to deal with the complicated changing real-world situations. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective novel loss function with adaptive loose optimization, which seeks to make the best of both worlds for question answering. Our main technical contribution is to reduce the loss adaptively according to the ratio between the previous and current optimization state on mini-batch training data. This loose optimization can be used to prevent non-debiasing methods from overlearning data bias while enabling debiasing methods to maintain slight bias learning. Experiments on the visual question answering datasets, including VQA v2, VQA-CP v1, VQA-CP v2, GQA-OOD, and the extractive question answering dataset SQuAD demonstrate that our approach enables QA methods to obtain state-of-the-art in- and out-of-distribution performance in most cases. The source code has been released publicly in urlhttps://github.com/reml-group/ALO.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2023.
Builds on
48 of 71 references.
References · 48
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
- 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
- 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
- 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
36 more
- 2022Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learningcited by 212
- 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 185
- 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
- 2020In Defense of Grid Features for Visual Question Answeringcited by 155
- 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
- 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 128
- 2016Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 123
- 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
- 2018Dynamic Fusion with Intra- and Inter- Modality Attention Flow for Visual Question Answeringcited by 114
- 2019Cycle-Consistency for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 105
- 2016Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answeringcited by 85
- 2020Look at the First Sentence: Position Bias in Question Answeringcited by 84
- 2015Are You Talking to a Machine? Dataset and Methods for Multilingual Image Question Answeringcited by 80
- 2020On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Lawcited by 74
- 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
- 2019MUREL: Multimodal Relational Reasoning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 68
- 2022Invariant Grounding for Video Question Answeringcited by 68
- 2019SG-Net: Syntax-Guided Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 52
- 2016Machine Comprehension Using Match-LSTM and Answer Pointercited by 47
- 2022Grounding Answers for Visual Questions Asked by Visually Impaired Peoplecited by 47
- 2021Bidirectional Machine Reading Comprehension for Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extractioncited by 40
- 2022SwapMix: Diagnosing and Regularizing the Over-Reliance on Visual Context in Visual Question Answeringcited by 38
- 2020Loss re-scaling VQA: Revisiting the LanguagePrior Problem from a Class-imbalance Viewcited by 36
- 2018Read + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questionscited by 31
- 2015Image Question Answering using Convolutional Neural Network with Dynamic Parameter Predictioncited by 26
- 2021Introspective Distillation for Robust Question Answeringcited by 25
- 2022Toward 3D Spatial Reasoning for Human-like Text-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 25
- 2020Adaptive Bi-directional Attention: Exploring Multi-Granularity Representations for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 22
- 2022Rethinking Data Augmentation for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 18
- 2020Meaningful Answer Generation of E-Commerce Question-Answeringcited by 16
- 2017DCN+: Mixed Objective and Deep Residual Coattention for Question Answeringcited by 12
- 2022Towards Robust Visual Question Answering: Making the Most of Biased Samples via Contrastive Learningcited by 9
- 2022Look to the Right: Mitigating Relative Position Bias in Extractive Question Answeringcited by 7
- 2022Learning by Hallucinating: Vision-Language Pre-training with Weak Supervisioncited by 6
- 2021Achieving Human Parity on Visual Question Answeringcited by 5
- 2022Semantic-aware Modular Capsule Routing for Visual Question Answeringcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.