Towards Robust Visual Question Answering: Making the Most of Biased Samples via Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Models for Visual Question Answering (VQA) often rely on the spurious correlations, i.e., the language priors, that appear in the biased samples of training set, which make them brittle against the out-of-distribution (OOD) test data. Recent methods have achieved promising progress in overcoming this problem by reducing the impact of biased samples on model training. However, these models reveal a trade-off that the improvements on OOD data severely sacrifice the performance on the in-distribution (ID) data (which is dominated by the biased samples). Therefore, we propose a novel contrastive learning approach, MMBS, for building robust VQA models by Making the Most of Biased Samples. Specifically, we construct positive samples for contrastive learning by eliminating the information related to spurious correlation from the original training samples and explore several strategies to use the constructed positive samples for training. Instead of undermining the importance of biased samples in model training, our approach precisely exploits the biased samples for unbiased information that contributes to reasoning. The proposed method is compatible with various VQA backbones. We validate our contributions by achieving competitive performance on the OOD dataset VQA-CP v2 while preserving robust performance on the ID dataset VQA v2.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2022.
Builds on
29 of 39 references.
References · 29
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
- 2018Bilinear Attention Networkscited by 277
- 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
17 more
- 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
- 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
- 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
- 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 127
- 2016Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Modelscited by 119
- 2018Overcoming Language Priors in Visual Question Answering with Adversarial Regularizationcited by 104
- 2017An Analysis of Visual Question Answering Algorithmscited by 90
- 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
- 2020On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Lawcited by 74
- 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
- 2020MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answeringcited by 63
- 2019Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 61
- 2019Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inferencecited by 48
- 2020Overcoming Language Priors with Self-supervised Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 43
- 2019Adversarial Regularization for Visual Question Answering: Strengths, Shortcomings, and Side Effectscited by 25
- 2021LPF: A Language-Prior Feedback Objective Function for De-biased Visual Question Answeringcited by 17
- 2021Check It Again: Progressive Visual Question Answering via Visual Entailmentcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023Robust Visual Question Answering: Datasets, Methods, and Future Challengescited by 23
- 2024Look, Listen, and Answer: Overcoming Biases for Audio-Visual Question Answeringcited by 18
- 2023Interpretable Visual Question Answering via Reasoning Supervisioncited by 4
- 2023Adaptive loose optimization for robust question answeringcited by 2
- 2022Compressing And Debiasing Vision-Language Pre-Trained Models for Visual Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2023Causal Reasoning through Two Layers of Cognition for Improving Generalization in Visual Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2024TPCL: Task Progressive Curriculum Learning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2026Online Self-Calibration Against Hallucination in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Counterfactual Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2026Counterfactual Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answering15 Sep 2026
- 2026Online Self-Calibration Against Hallucination in Vision-Language Models1 May 2026
- 2024TPCL: Task Progressive Curriculum Learning for Robust Visual Question Answering26 Nov 2024
- 2024Look, Listen, and Answer: Overcoming Biases for Audio-Visual Question Answering18 Apr 2024
- 2023Causal Reasoning through Two Layers of Cognition for Improving Generalization in Visual Question Answering9 Oct 2023
- 2023Interpretable Visual Question Answering via Reasoning Supervision7 Sep 2023
- 2023Robust Visual Question Answering: Datasets, Methods, and Future Challenges21 Jul 2023
- 2023Adaptive loose optimization for robust question answering6 May 2023
- 2022Compressing And Debiasing Vision-Language Pre-Trained Models for Visual Question Answering26 Oct 2022