Sample and Computationally Efficient Stochastic Kriging in High Dimensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stochastic kriging has been widely employed for simulation metamodeling to predict the response surface of complex simulation models. However, its use is limited to cases where the design space is low-dimensional because, in general, the sample complexity (i.e., the number of design points required for stochastic kriging to produce an accurate prediction) grows exponentially in the dimensionality of the design space. The large sample size results in both a prohibitive sample cost for running the simulation model and a severe computational challenge due to the need to invert large covariance matrices. Based on tensor Markov kernels and sparse grid experimental designs, we develop a novel methodology that dramatically alleviates the curse of dimensionality. We show that the sample complexity of the proposed methodology grows only slightly in the dimensionality, even under model misspecification. We also develop fast algorithms that compute stochastic kriging in its exact form without any approximation schemes. We demonstrate via extensive numerical experiments that our methodology can handle problems with a design space of more than 10,000 dimensions, improving both prediction accuracy and computational efficiency by orders of magnitude relative to typical alternative methods in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4.
6 papers.
- 2023Random Smoothing Regularization in Kernel Gradient Descent Learningcited by 6
- 2024Sample-Efficient "Clustering and Conquer" Procedures for Parallel Large-Scale Ranking and Selectioncited by 2
- 2023Representing Additive Gaussian Processes by Sparse Matricescited by 0
- 2024Beyond State Space Representation: A General Theory for Kernel Packetscited by 0
- 2024Kernel Multigrid: Accelerate Back-fitting via Sparse Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 0
- 2024Sensitivity Analysis on Policy-Augmented Graphical Hybrid Models with Shapley Value Estimationcited by 0
- 2024Sensitivity Analysis on Policy-Augmented Graphical Hybrid Models with Shapley Value Estimation20 Nov 2024
- 2024Kernel Multigrid: Accelerate Back-fitting via Sparse Gaussian Process Regression20 Mar 2024
- 2024Beyond State Space Representation: A General Theory for Kernel Packets6 Feb 2024
- 2024Sample-Efficient "Clustering and Conquer" Procedures for Parallel Large-Scale Ranking and Selection3 Feb 2024
- 2023Random Smoothing Regularization in Kernel Gradient Descent Learning5 May 2023
- 2023Representing Additive Gaussian Processes by Sparse Matrices29 Apr 2023