mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Incentivising the federation: gradient-based metrics for data selection and valuation in private decentralised training

arXiv 2305.02942 ↗First posted 4 May 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Obtaining high-quality data for collaborative training of machine learning models can be a challenging task due to A) regulatory concerns and B) a lack of data owner incentives to participate. The first issue can be addressed through the combination of distributed machine learning techniques (e.g. federated learning) and privacy enhancing technologies (PET), such as the differentially private (DP) model training. The second challenge can be addressed by rewarding the participants for giving access to data which is beneficial to the training model, which is of particular importance in federated settings, where the data is unevenly distributed. However, DP noise can adversely affect the underrepresented and the atypical (yet often informative) data samples, making it difficult to assess their usefulness. In this work, we investigate how to leverage gradient information to permit the participants of private training settings to select the data most beneficial for the jointly trained model. We assess two such methods, namely variance of gradients (VoG) and the privacy loss-input susceptibility score (PLIS). We show that these techniques can provide the federated clients with tools for principled data selection even in stricter privacy settings.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  3. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  4. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  5. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
  6. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
  7. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  8. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
  9. 2019The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 246
  10. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
  11. 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 142
  12. 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 141
8 more
  1. 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 97
  2. 2020Convergence of Update Aware Device Scheduling for Federated Learning at the Wireless Edgecited by 71
  3. 2020Collaborative Machine Learning with Incentive-Aware Model Rewardscited by 71
  4. 2020Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacycited by 61
  5. 2020Toward Understanding the Influence of Individual Clients in Federated Learningcited by 16
  6. 2022Beyond Gradients: Exploiting Adversarial Priors in Model Inversion Attackscited by 7
  7. 2022How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy?cited by 2
  8. 2021Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trustcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.