Privacy-Preserving Dataset Combination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Access to diverse, high-quality datasets is crucial for machine learning model performance, yet data sharing remains limited by privacy concerns and competitive interests, particularly in regulated domains like healthcare. This dynamic especially disadvantages smaller organizations that lack resources to purchase data or negotiate favorable sharing agreements, due to the inability to privately assess external data's utility. To resolve privacy and uncertainty tensions simultaneously, we introduce SecureKL, the first secure protocol for dataset-to-dataset evaluations with zero privacy leakage, designed to be applied preceding data sharing. SecureKL evaluates a source dataset against candidates, performing dataset divergence metrics internally with private computations, all without assuming downstream models. On real-world data, SecureKL achieves high consistency (>90% correlation with non-private counterparts) and successfully identifies beneficial data collaborations in highly-heterogeneous domains (ICU mortality prediction across hospitals and income prediction across states). Our results highlight that secure computation maximizes data utilization, outperforming privacy-agnostic utility assessments that leak information.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2025.
Builds on
64 of 120 references.
References · 64
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,380
38 more
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 1,002
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
- 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 808
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
- 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 671
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
- 2020Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 187
- 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
- 2023CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languagescited by 174
- 2020Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defensescited by 166
- 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
- 2021CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine Learningcited by 131
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
- 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 122
- 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 93
- 2022What Language Model to Train if You Have One Million GPU Hours?cited by 92
- 2023SlimPajama-DC: Understanding Data Combinations for LLM Trainingcited by 72
- 2023Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 66
50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.