mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Privacy-Preserving Dataset Combination

arXiv 2502.05765 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.CR cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Access to diverse, high-quality datasets is crucial for machine learning model performance, yet data sharing remains limited by privacy concerns and competitive interests, particularly in regulated domains like healthcare. This dynamic especially disadvantages smaller organizations that lack resources to purchase data or negotiate favorable sharing agreements, due to the inability to privately assess external data's utility. To resolve privacy and uncertainty tensions simultaneously, we introduce SecureKL, the first secure protocol for dataset-to-dataset evaluations with zero privacy leakage, designed to be applied preceding data sharing. SecureKL evaluates a source dataset against candidates, performing dataset divergence metrics internally with private computations, all without assuming downstream models. On real-world data, SecureKL achieves high consistency (>90% correlation with non-private counterparts) and successfully identifies beneficial data collaborations in highly-heterogeneous domains (ICU mortality prediction across hospitals and income prediction across states). Our results highlight that secure computation maximizes data utilization, outperforming privacy-agnostic utility assessments that leak information.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2025.

Builds on

64 of 120 references.

References · 64

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  6. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  7. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  8. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  9. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  10. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  11. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  12. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,380
38 more
  1. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  2. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  3. 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 1,002
  4. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
  5. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
  6. 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 808
  7. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
  8. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
  9. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  10. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
  11. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 671
  12. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  13. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  14. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  15. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
  16. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  17. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
  18. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  19. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  20. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  21. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
  22. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
  23. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
  24. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
  25. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  26. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
  27. 2020Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 187
  28. 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
  29. 2023CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languagescited by 174
  30. 2020Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defensescited by 166
  31. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
  32. 2021CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine Learningcited by 131
  33. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
  34. 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 122
  35. 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 93
  36. 2022What Language Model to Train if You Have One Million GPU Hours?cited by 92
  37. 2023SlimPajama-DC: Understanding Data Combinations for LLM Trainingcited by 72
  38. 2023Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 66

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.