Synthetic DOmain-Targeted Augmentation (S-DOTA) Improves Model Generalization in Digital Pathology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning algorithms have the potential to improve patient outcomes in digital pathology. However, generalization of these tools is currently limited by sensitivity to variations in tissue preparation, staining procedures and scanning equipment that lead to domain shift in digitized slides. To overcome this limitation and improve model generalization, we studied the effectiveness of two Synthetic DOmain-Targeted Augmentation (S-DOTA) methods, namely CycleGAN-enabled Scanner Transform (ST) and targeted Stain Vector Augmentation (SVA), and compared them against the International Color Consortium (ICC) profile-based color calibration (ICC Cal) method and a baseline method using traditional brightness, color and noise augmentations. We evaluated the ability of these techniques to improve model generalization to various tasks and settings: four models, two model types (tissue segmentation and cell classification), two loss functions, six labs, six scanners, and three indications (hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), prostate adenocarcinoma). We compared these methods based on the macro-averaged F1 scores on in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) test sets across multiple domains, and found that S-DOTA methods (i.e., ST and SVA) led to significant improvements over ICC Cal and baseline on OOD data while maintaining comparable performance on ID data. Thus, we demonstrate that S-DOTA may help address generalization due to domain shift in real world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.
Builds on
9 of 21 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2019Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathologycited by 172
- 2016Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancercited by 93
- 2022Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challengecited by 66
- 2021Assessing domain adaptation techniques for mitosis detection in multi-scanner breast cancer histopathology imagescited by 5
- 2023Multi-domain stain normalization for digital pathology: A cycle-consistent adversarial network for whole slide imagescited by 4
- 2023Standardized CycleGAN training for unsupervised stain adaptation in invasive carcinoma classification for breast histopathologycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 144
- 2023Virchow: A Million-Slide Digital Pathology Foundation Modelcited by 86
- 2024PLUTO: Pathology-Universal Transformercited by 17
- 2024SRA: A Novel Method to Improve Feature Embedding in Self-supervised Learning for Histopathological Imagescited by 2
- 2024Adapting Self-Supervised Learning for Computational Pathologycited by 1
- 2026Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation with Latent Diffusion for Pathology Image Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation with Latent Diffusion for Pathology Image Classification23 Jan 2026
- 2024SRA: A Novel Method to Improve Feature Embedding in Self-supervised Learning for Histopathological Images23 Oct 2024
- 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathology1 Aug 2024
- 2024PLUTO: Pathology-Universal Transformer13 May 2024
- 2024Adapting Self-Supervised Learning for Computational Pathology2 May 2024
- 2023Virchow: A Million-Slide Digital Pathology Foundation Model14 Sep 2023