Assessing domain adaptation techniques for mitosis detection in multi-scanner breast cancer histopathology images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, with over two million new cases each year. During diagnostic tumour grading, pathologists manually count the number of dividing cells (mitotic figures) in biopsy or tumour resection specimens. Since the process is subjective and time-consuming, data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been developed to automatically detect mitotic figures. However, these methods often generalise poorly, with performance reduced by variations in tissue types, staining protocols, or the scanners used to digitise whole-slide images. Domain adaptation approaches have been adopted in various applications to mitigate this issue of domain shift. We evaluate two unsupervised domain adaptation methods, CycleGAN and Neural Style Transfer, using the MIDOG 2021 Challenge dataset. This challenge focuses on detecting mitotic figures in whole-slide images digitised using different scanners. Two baseline mitosis detection models based on U-Net and RetinaNet were investigated in combination with the aforementioned domain adaptation methods. Both baseline models achieved human expert level performance, but had reduced performance when evaluated on images which had been digitised using a different scanner. The domain adaptation techniques were each found to be beneficial for detection with data from some scanners but not for others, with the only average increase across all scanners being achieved by CycleGAN on the RetinaNet detector. These techniques require further refinement to ensure consistency in mitosis detection.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2021.
Builds on
9 of 27 references.
References · 9
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 752
- 2017Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networkscited by 707
- 2015A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Stylecited by 483
- 2020Virtual staining for mitosis detection in Breast Histopathologycited by 13
- 2019Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Pulmonary Hemosiderophages in Cytology Slidescited by 8
- 2020Histopathological Stain Transfer using Style Transfer Network with Adversarial Losscited by 7
- 2020How Many Annotators Do We Need? -- A Study on the Influence of Inter-Observer Variability on the Reliability of Automatic Mitotic Figure Assessmentcited by 2
- 2019Fluorescence Image Histology Pattern Transformation using Image Style Transfercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3.
5 papers.
- 2022Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challengecited by 67
- 2023Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Decade of Progress and Future Directionscited by 11
- 2023Synthetic DOmain-Targeted Augmentation (S-DOTA) Improves Model Generalization in Digital Pathologycited by 6
- 2023Generative Adversarial Networks for Stain Normalisation in Histopathologycited by 3
- 2022Improving Mitosis Detection Via UNet-based Adversarial Domain Homogenizercited by 0
- 2023Generative Adversarial Networks for Stain Normalisation in Histopathology5 Aug 2023
- 2023Synthetic DOmain-Targeted Augmentation (S-DOTA) Improves Model Generalization in Digital Pathology3 May 2023
- 2023Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Decade of Progress and Future Directions13 Apr 2023
- 2022Improving Mitosis Detection Via UNet-based Adversarial Domain Homogenizer15 Sep 2022
- 2022Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challenge6 Apr 2022