mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Escaping the sentence-level paradigm in machine translation

arXiv 2304.12959 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is well-known that document context is vital for resolving a range of translation ambiguities, and in fact the document setting is the most natural setting for nearly all translation. It is therefore unfortunate that machine translation -- both research and production -- largely remains stuck in a decades-old sentence-level translation paradigm. It is also an increasingly glaring problem in light of competitive pressure from large language models, which are natively document-based. Much work in document-context machine translation exists, but for various reasons has been unable to catch hold. This paper suggests a path out of this rut by addressing three impediments at once: what architectures should we use? where do we get document-level information for training them? and how do we know whether they are any good? In contrast to work on specialized architectures, we show that the standard Transformer architecture is sufficient, provided it has enough capacity. Next, we address the training data issue by taking document samples from back-translated data only, where the data is not only more readily available, but is also of higher quality compared to parallel document data, which may contain machine translation output. Finally, we propose generative variants of existing contrastive metrics that are better able to discriminate among document systems. Results in four large-data language pairs (DErightarrowEN, ENrightarrowDE, ENrightarrowFR, and ENrightarrowRU) establish the success of these three pieces together in improving document-level performance.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2023.

Builds on

34 of 63 references.

References · 34

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  7. 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
  8. 2019WikiMatrix: Mining 135M Parallel Sentences in 1620 Language Pairs from Wikipediacited by 221
  9. 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
  10. 2018Fast Lexically Constrained Decoding with Dynamic Beam Allocation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 181
  11. 2019CCMatrix: Mining Billions of High-Quality Parallel Sentences on the WEBcited by 177
  12. 2018Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Learns Anaphora Resolutioncited by 97
22 more
  1. 2017Neural Machine Translation with Extended Contextcited by 95
  2. 2019Star-Transformercited by 94
  3. 2023Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 90
  4. 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
  5. 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
  6. 2018Document-Level Neural Machine Translation with Hierarchical Attention Networkscited by 85
  7. 2023Large language models effectively leverage document-level context for literary translation, but critical errors persistcited by 80
  8. 2018Improving the Transformer Translation Model with Document-Level Contextcited by 74
  9. 2021BlonDe: An Automatic Evaluation Metric for Document-level Machine Translationcited by 58
  10. 2019Microsoft Translator at WMT 2019: Towards Large-Scale Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  11. 2022Embarrassingly Easy Document-Level MT Metrics: How to Convert Any Pretrained Metric Into a Document-Level Metriccited by 56
  12. 2021G-Transformer for Document-level Machine Translationcited by 46
  13. 2019Context-Aware Monolingual Repair for Neural Machine Translationcited by 41
  14. 2017Learning to Remember Translation History with a Continuous Cachecited by 39
  15. 2020Rethinking Document-level Neural Machine Translationcited by 32
  16. 2018Marian: Cost-effective High-Quality Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 22
  17. 2021On the Limits of Minimal Pairs in Contrastive Evaluationcited by 15
  18. 2023Document Flattening: Beyond Concatenating Context for Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 15
  19. 2020Contextual Neural Machine Translation Improves Translation of Cataphoric Pronounscited by 13
  20. 2019A Survey on Document-level Neural Machine Translation: Methods and Evaluationcited by 12
  21. 2023Encoding Sentence Position in Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation with Concatenationcited by 6
  22. 2019Document Sub-structure in Neural Machine Translationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 8; 2024: 8; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

27 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
  2. 2024Adapting Large Language Models for Document-Level Machine Translationcited by 59
  3. 2023Contextual Refinement of Translations: Large Language Models for Sentence and Document-Level Post-Editingcited by 21
  4. 2023Identifying Context-Dependent Translations for Evaluation Set Productioncited by 14
  5. 2023Document-Level Language Models for Machine Translationcited by 12
  6. 2023SLIDE: Reference-free Evaluation for Machine Translation using a Sliding Document Windowcited by 11
  7. 2023Training and Meta-Evaluating Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics at the Paragraph Levelcited by 9
  8. 2024On Measuring Context Utilization in Document-Level MT Systemscited by 9
  9. 2025Do LLMs Understand Your Translations? Evaluating Paragraph-level MT with Question Answeringcited by 9
  10. 2024Recovering document annotations for sentence-level bitextcited by 6
  11. 2025Extending Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation to Book-Length Documentscited by 6
  12. 2023Challenges in Context-Aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
15 more
  1. 2024Context-Aware or Context-Insensitive? Assessing LLMs' Performance in Document-Level Translationcited by 5
  2. 2024Analyzing the Attention Heads for Pronoun Disambiguation in Context-aware Machine Translation Modelscited by 4
  3. 2023SOTASTREAM: A Streaming Approach to Machine Translation Trainingcited by 3
  4. 2024Machine Translation Models are Zero-Shot Detectors of Translation Directioncited by 3
  5. 2025You Are What You Train: Effects of Data Composition on Training Context-aware Machine Translation Modelscited by 3
  6. 2024On Instruction-Finetuning Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 2
  7. 2023A Case Study on Context Encoding in Multi-Encoder based Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 1
  8. 2026Which Tokens Need Context? A Reference-Based Analysis of Translation Responsibility Using Fertility and Entropycited by 1
  9. 2024Promoting Target Data in Context-aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 0
  10. 2025A comparison of translation performance between DeepL and Supertextcited by 0
  11. 2025MultiScale Contextual Bandits for Long Term Objectivescited by 0
  12. 2025Beyond the Sentence: A Survey on Context-Aware Machine Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
  13. 2025Unlocking Latent Discourse Translation in LLMs Through Quality-Aware Decodingcited by 0
  14. 2026Can an Old Dog Be Taught New Tricks? Taking LLMs Beyond Sentence Level Translationcited by 0
  15. 2026Scaling Attention Head Analysis via Gradient-Based Attribution in Context-Aware Machine Translationcited by 0