mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extending Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation to Book-Length Documents

arXiv 2509.17249 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2025cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrating superior translation performance and long-context capabilities, evaluation methodologies remain constrained to sentence-level assessment due to dataset limitations, token number restrictions in metrics, and rigid sentence boundary requirements. We introduce SEGALE, an evaluation scheme that extends existing automatic metrics to long-document translation by treating documents as continuous text and applying sentence segmentation and alignment methods. Our approach enables previously unattainable document-level evaluation, handling translations of arbitrary length generated with document-level prompts while accounting for under-/over-translations and varied sentence boundaries. Experiments show our scheme significantly outperforms existing long-form document evaluation schemes, while being comparable to evaluations performed with groundtruth sentence alignments. Additionally, we apply our scheme to book-length texts and newly demonstrate that many open-weight LLMs fail to effectively translate documents at their reported maximum context lengths.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2025.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  2. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
  3. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2018Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyondcited by 434
  7. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  8. 2023L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Modelscited by 233
  9. 2024EuroLLM: Multilingual Language Models for Europecited by 106
  10. 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
  11. 2024MetricX-24: The Google Submission to the WMT 2024 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 93
  12. 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
12 more
  1. 2018Document-Level Neural Machine Translation with Hierarchical Attention Networkscited by 85
  2. 2023Large language models effectively leverage document-level context for literary translation, but critical errors persistcited by 80
  3. 2019Selective Attention for Context-aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
  4. 2019Microsoft Translator at WMT 2019: Towards Large-Scale Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  5. 2022Embarrassingly Easy Document-Level MT Metrics: How to Convert Any Pretrained Metric Into a Document-Level Metriccited by 56
  6. 2022Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literaturecited by 45
  7. 2017Does Neural Machine Translation Benefit from Larger Context?cited by 38
  8. 2023Escaping the sentence-level paradigm in machine translationcited by 27
  9. 2023SLIDE: Reference-free Evaluation for Machine Translation using a Sliding Document Windowcited by 11
  10. 2024Introducing the NewsPaLM MBR and QE Dataset: LLM-Generated High-Quality Parallel Data Outperforms Traditional Web-Crawled Datacited by 10
  11. 2023Improving Long Context Document-Level Machine Translationcited by 8
  12. 2024Evaluating the IWSLT2023 Speech Translation Tasks: Human Annotations, Automatic Metrics, and Segmentationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.