mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Topology-Aware Focal Loss for 3D Image Segmentation

arXiv 2304.12223 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2023eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The efficacy of segmentation algorithms is frequently compromised by topological errors like overlapping regions, disrupted connections, and voids. To tackle this problem, we introduce a novel loss function, namely Topology-Aware Focal Loss (TAFL), that incorporates the conventional Focal Loss with a topological constraint term based on the Wasserstein distance between the ground truth and predicted segmentation masks' persistence diagrams. By enforcing identical topology as the ground truth, the topological constraint can effectively resolve topological errors, while Focal Loss tackles class imbalance. We begin by constructing persistence diagrams from filtered cubical complexes of the ground truth and predicted segmentation masks. We subsequently utilize the Sinkhorn-Knopp algorithm to determine the optimal transport plan between the two persistence diagrams. The resultant transport plan minimizes the cost of transporting mass from one distribution to the other and provides a mapping between the points in the two persistence diagrams. We then compute the Wasserstein distance based on this travel plan to measure the topological dissimilarity between the ground truth and predicted masks. We evaluate our approach by training a 3D U-Net with the MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge validation dataset, which requires accurate segmentation of 3D MRI scans that integrate various modalities for the precise identification and tracking of malignant brain tumors. Then, we demonstrate that the quality of segmentation performance is enhanced by regularizing the focal loss through the addition of a topological constraint as a penalty term.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2023.

Builds on

21 of 51 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  4. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,487
  5. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
  6. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 959
  7. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  8. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 328
  9. 2019Topology-Preserving Deep Image Segmentationcited by 198
  10. 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
  11. 2015A roadmap for the computation of persistent homologycited by 127
  12. 2017Deep Learning with Topological Signaturescited by 114
9 more
  1. 2017Beyond the Pixel-Wise Loss for Topology-Aware Delineationcited by 83
  2. 2021Optimized U-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 40
  3. 2018Fast and Accurate Tumor Segmentation of Histology Images using Persistent Homology and Deep Convolutional Featurescited by 28
  4. 2020Uncovering the Topology of Time-Varying fMRI Data using Cubical Persistencecited by 26
  5. 2020Cubical Ripser: Software for computing persistent homology of image and volume datacited by 23
  6. 2018Functional Summaries of Persistence Diagramscited by 19
  7. 2017Persistent homology machine learning for fingerprint classificationcited by 11
  8. 2018Topological Data Analysis of Task-Based fMRI Data from Experiments on Schizophreniacited by 10
  9. 2021Topological Deep Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

12 papers.