mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ACROCPoLis: A Descriptive Framework for Making Sense of Fairness

arXiv 2304.11217 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2023cs.CY cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness is central to the ethical and responsible development and use of AI systems, with a large number of frameworks and formal notions of algorithmic fairness being available. However, many of the fairness solutions proposed revolve around technical considerations and not the needs of and consequences for the most impacted communities. We therefore want to take the focus away from definitions and allow for the inclusion of societal and relational aspects to represent how the effects of AI systems impact and are experienced by individuals and social groups. In this paper, we do this by means of proposing the ACROCPoLis framework to represent allocation processes with a modeling emphasis on fairness aspects. The framework provides a shared vocabulary in which the factors relevant to fairness assessments for different situations and procedures are made explicit, as well as their interrelationships. This enables us to compare analogous situations, to highlight the differences in dissimilar situations, and to capture differing interpretations of the same situation by different stakeholders.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2023.

Builds on

18 of 59 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  6. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  7. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
  8. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
  9. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  10. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  11. 2019Average Individual Fairness: Algorithms, Generalization and Experimentscited by 46
  12. 2020Algorithmic Fairness from a Non-ideal Perspectivecited by 30
6 more
  1. 2021Hard Choices in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
  2. 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
  3. 2022Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesiscited by 22
  4. 2017The impossibility of "fairness": a generalized impossibility result for decisionscited by 12
  5. 2021Dealing with Expert Bias in Collective Decision-Makingcited by 4
  6. 2021The Myth of Complete AI-Fairnesscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.