mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Ontologies to Document Bias in Data

arXiv 2407.00509 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) systems are capable of reproducing and often amplifying undesired biases. This puts emphasis on the importance of operating under practices that enable the study and understanding of the intrinsic characteristics of ML pipelines, prompting the emergence of documentation frameworks with the idea that ``any remedy for bias starts with awareness of its existence''. However, a resource that can formally describe these pipelines in terms of biases detected is still amiss. To fill this gap, we present the Doc-BiasO ontology, a resource that aims to create an integrated vocabulary of biases defined in the textitfair-ML literature and their measures, as well as to incorporate relevant terminology and the relationships between them. Overseeing ontology engineering best practices, we re-use existing vocabulary on machine learning and AI, to foster knowledge sharing and interoperability between the actors concerned with its research, development, regulation, among others. Overall, our main objective is to contribute towards clarifying existing terminology on bias research as it rapidly expands to all areas of AI and to improve the interpretation of bias in data and downstream impact.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2024.

Builds on

18 of 60 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  4. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  5. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  6. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  7. 2022Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reductioncited by 137
  8. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  9. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  10. 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
  11. 2022Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniquescited by 37
  12. 2022Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desideratacited by 28
6 more
  1. 2023Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Actcited by 14
  2. 2018ML-Schema: Exposing the Semantics of Machine Learning with Schemas and Ontologiescited by 13
  3. 2019ABOUT ML: Annotation and Benchmarking on Understanding and Transparency of Machine Learning Lifecyclescited by 13
  4. 2023Reproducibility of Machine Learning: Terminology, Recommendations and Open Issuescited by 8
  5. 2023ACROCPoLis: A Descriptive Framework for Making Sense of Fairnesscited by 8
  6. 2023The W3C Data Catalog Vocabulary, Version 2: Rationale, Design Principles, and Uptakecited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.