mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Sampling for Pairwise Comparisons via Approximate Message Passing and Information Gain Maximization

arXiv 2004.05691 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pairwise comparison data arise in many domains with subjective assessment experiments, for example in image and video quality assessment. In these experiments observers are asked to express a preference between two conditions. However, many pairwise comparison protocols require a large number of comparisons to infer accurate scores, which may be unfeasible when each comparison is time-consuming (e.g. videos) or expensive (e.g. medical imaging). This motivates the use of an active sampling algorithm that chooses only the most informative pairs for comparison. In this paper we propose ASAP, an active sampling algorithm based on approximate message passing and expected information gain maximization. Unlike most existing methods, which rely on partial updates of the posterior distribution, we are able to perform full updates and therefore much improve the accuracy of the inferred scores. The algorithm relies on three techniques for reducing computational cost: inference based on approximate message passing, selective evaluations of the information gain, and selecting pairs in a batch that forms a minimum spanning tree of the inverse of information gain. We demonstrate, with real and synthetic data, that ASAP offers the highest accuracy of inferred scores compared to the existing methods. We also provide an open-source GPU implementation of ASAP for large-scale experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Towards Open-ended Visual Quality Comparisoncited by 85
  2. 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 53
  3. 2024ColorVideoVDP: A visual difference predictor for image, video and display distortionscited by 32
  4. 2023Perceptual Quality Assessment of NeRF and Neural View Synthesis Methods for Front-Facing Viewscited by 17
  5. 2023An Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Portraitscited by 13
  6. 2024NeRF-NQA: No-Reference Quality Assessment for Scenes Generated by NeRF and Neural View Synthesis Methodscited by 10
  7. 2025Measuring Scalar Constructs in Social Science with LLMscited by 8
  8. 2026X2HDR: HDR Image Generation in a Perceptually Uniform Spacecited by 7
  9. 2025HDRSDR-VQA: A Subjective Video Quality Dataset for HDR and SDR Comparative Evaluationcited by 4
  10. 2022GitRanking: A Ranking of GitHub Topics for Software Classification using Active Samplingcited by 3
  11. 2025Efficiency-Effectiveness Reranking FLOPs for LLM-based Rerankerscited by 3
  12. 2025Are Optimal Algorithms Still Optimal? Rethinking Sorting in LLM-Based Pairwise Ranking with Batching and Cachingcited by 2
5 more
  1. 2024Pairwise Comparisons Are All You Needcited by 1
  2. 2025ICME 2025 Generalizable HDR and SDR Video Quality Measurement Grand Challengecited by 1
  3. 2026MemRerank: Preference Memory for Personalized Product Rerankingcited by 1
  4. 2022Improving Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling method to measure inter content scalecited by 0
  5. 2026Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluationcited by 0